{"title":"The New Agriculture: From Food Farms to Solar Farms","authors":"Jessica Owley, A. Morris","doi":"10.7916/CJEL.V44I2.1859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Across the United States, government agencies and energy developers are looking to agricultural land for development of renewable energy. One attraction of agricultural lands is that they are already relatively ecologically impaired compared with the previous solar development sites in the California and Arizona desert that have been a major source of concern for many environmental groups — and subject to expensive mitigation requirements under the Endangered Species Act. Renewable energy development pressures are accelerating the existing loss of agricultural land, heightening concerns about food security and the economic viability of agricultural communities. California farmland is at the center of this conflict. Suburban sprawl in California already leads to conversion of nearly 40,000 acres of agricultural land a year. \n \nNow, a new competitor has entered the scene: solar energy facilities. Both users compete for water, which is only becoming scarcer in the face of climate change and periodic drought. The pressures on California’s agricultural land have long inspired the state legislature and local governments to enact various measures to protect farmland and promote the business of agriculture. We examine the ways California’s Williamson Act (which provides tax benefits for agricultural land) and the California Environmental Quality Act (the state’s environmental review statute) have proven and not proven to be obstacles to taking agricultural land out of crop production and putting it into solar energy production. We demonstrate that current laws are neither protecting prime agricultural lands nor adequately creating conditions for evaluating the tradeoffs and alternatives when farmland — or ecologically sensitive habitat — is used for large-scale renewable energy development.","PeriodicalId":175783,"journal":{"name":"Food Law & Policy eJournal","volume":"295 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Law & Policy eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7916/CJEL.V44I2.1859","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Abstract
Across the United States, government agencies and energy developers are looking to agricultural land for development of renewable energy. One attraction of agricultural lands is that they are already relatively ecologically impaired compared with the previous solar development sites in the California and Arizona desert that have been a major source of concern for many environmental groups — and subject to expensive mitigation requirements under the Endangered Species Act. Renewable energy development pressures are accelerating the existing loss of agricultural land, heightening concerns about food security and the economic viability of agricultural communities. California farmland is at the center of this conflict. Suburban sprawl in California already leads to conversion of nearly 40,000 acres of agricultural land a year.
Now, a new competitor has entered the scene: solar energy facilities. Both users compete for water, which is only becoming scarcer in the face of climate change and periodic drought. The pressures on California’s agricultural land have long inspired the state legislature and local governments to enact various measures to protect farmland and promote the business of agriculture. We examine the ways California’s Williamson Act (which provides tax benefits for agricultural land) and the California Environmental Quality Act (the state’s environmental review statute) have proven and not proven to be obstacles to taking agricultural land out of crop production and putting it into solar energy production. We demonstrate that current laws are neither protecting prime agricultural lands nor adequately creating conditions for evaluating the tradeoffs and alternatives when farmland — or ecologically sensitive habitat — is used for large-scale renewable energy development.
在美国各地,政府机构和能源开发商都在寻找农业用地来开发可再生能源。农业用地的一个吸引力在于,与之前在加州和亚利桑那州沙漠的太阳能开发用地相比,它们的生态环境已经相对受损,这些太阳能开发用地一直是许多环保组织关注的主要来源,并且受到《濒危物种法》(Endangered Species Act)昂贵的缓解要求的约束。可再生能源发展的压力正在加速现有农业用地的流失,加剧了人们对粮食安全和农业社区经济可行性的担忧。加州的农田是这场冲突的中心。加州郊区的扩张已经导致每年近4万英亩农业用地的转变。现在,一个新的竞争者进入了这个领域:太阳能设施。这两个用户都在争夺水资源,而面对气候变化和周期性干旱,水资源只会变得越来越稀缺。长期以来,加州农业用地的压力一直促使州立法机构和地方政府制定各种措施来保护农田,促进农业经营。我们考察了加州的《威廉姆森法案》(该法案为农业用地提供税收优惠)和《加州环境质量法》(该州的环境审查法规)已被证明或未被证明是将农业用地从作物生产转为太阳能生产的障碍。我们证明,现行法律既没有保护优质农业用地,也没有充分创造条件,在农田——或生态敏感栖息地——被用于大规模可再生能源开发时,评估权衡和替代方案。