Structural Relationships of Elementary School Students’ Perception of Formative Feedback, Belief of Intelligence, Attitude Towards Assessment, Behavioral Intention, and Classroom Engagement

Hyun-Woo Noh
{"title":"Structural Relationships of Elementary School Students’ Perception of Formative Feedback, Belief of Intelligence, Attitude Towards Assessment, Behavioral Intention, and Classroom Engagement","authors":"Hyun-Woo Noh","doi":"10.31158/jeev.2022.35.3.439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aims of this study was to explore the structural relationships among students’ attitudes toward assessment(SATA), the incremental belief of intelligence, the perceived teachers’ formative feedback, behavioral intention, and classroom engagement in either formative or summative assessment situations. In the study the multi-level SEM approach was used to identify the structural relationships among the SATA and its related variables using Mplus. The findings revealed that incremental belief of intelligence and formative feedback had a statistically significant positive effect on expectancy and value and an indirect effect on learners’ participation through value, positive affect, and behavioral intention. Specifically, formative feedback had a positive direct effect on behavioral intention and learners’ participation. The educational implications based on the results of this study are as follows. First, teachers’ formative feedback and students’ incremental beliefs of intelligence are variables with a positive influence on SATA. Second, students ascribe a greater value to and have better expectations from summative assessment rather than formative assessment. They consider summative assessment results to be more important. Although the mean of value and expectation in formative assessment was low, value showed the greatest positive effect on positive affect while expectation reduced negative affect in formative assessment. Therefore, to help improve students’ learning, the role of formative assessment is important. There is a need to emphasize that teachers should use student-centered assessment to consider students’ individual differences in learning and enhance students’ learning by providing formative feedback.","PeriodicalId":207460,"journal":{"name":"Korean Society for Educational Evaluation","volume":"89 4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Society for Educational Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31158/jeev.2022.35.3.439","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aims of this study was to explore the structural relationships among students’ attitudes toward assessment(SATA), the incremental belief of intelligence, the perceived teachers’ formative feedback, behavioral intention, and classroom engagement in either formative or summative assessment situations. In the study the multi-level SEM approach was used to identify the structural relationships among the SATA and its related variables using Mplus. The findings revealed that incremental belief of intelligence and formative feedback had a statistically significant positive effect on expectancy and value and an indirect effect on learners’ participation through value, positive affect, and behavioral intention. Specifically, formative feedback had a positive direct effect on behavioral intention and learners’ participation. The educational implications based on the results of this study are as follows. First, teachers’ formative feedback and students’ incremental beliefs of intelligence are variables with a positive influence on SATA. Second, students ascribe a greater value to and have better expectations from summative assessment rather than formative assessment. They consider summative assessment results to be more important. Although the mean of value and expectation in formative assessment was low, value showed the greatest positive effect on positive affect while expectation reduced negative affect in formative assessment. Therefore, to help improve students’ learning, the role of formative assessment is important. There is a need to emphasize that teachers should use student-centered assessment to consider students’ individual differences in learning and enhance students’ learning by providing formative feedback.
小学生形成反馈知觉、智力信念、评价态度、行为意向与课堂投入的结构关系
本研究旨在探讨在形成性或总结性评估情境下,学生的评估态度、智力增量信念、感知教师的形成性反馈、行为意向和课堂投入之间的结构关系。本研究采用多层扫描电镜方法,利用Mplus识别SATA及其相关变量之间的结构关系。结果表明,智力增量信念和形成性反馈对期望和价值有显著的正向影响,并通过价值、积极影响和行为意向对学习者的参与有间接影响。具体而言,形成性反馈对行为意向和学习者的参与有正向的直接影响。基于本研究结果的教育意义如下。首先,教师的形成性反馈和学生的智力增量信念是影响SATA的正向变量。第二,学生对总结性评价的重视程度高于形成性评价,对总结性评价的期望也高于形成性评价。他们认为总结性评估结果更重要。虽然形成性评价中价值和期望的均值较低,但形成性评价中价值对积极情感的正向影响最大,期望对消极情感的正向影响最大。因此,帮助提高学生的学习,形成性评价的作用是重要的。需要强调的是,教师应该使用以学生为中心的评估,考虑学生在学习中的个体差异,并通过提供形成性反馈来促进学生的学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信