Investigating students understanding of organic reaction mechanisms from performing organic chemistry experiments

N. Mistry, S. Nicholson
{"title":"Investigating students understanding of organic reaction mechanisms from performing organic chemistry experiments","authors":"N. Mistry, S. Nicholson","doi":"10.29311/ndtps.v0i15.3447","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of laboratory work to improve students’ knowledge of theory is one that is disputed. Student reflections of what they learn during practical work repeatedly show that students rarely think about theory. There is a lack of data that objectively compares students’ knowledge of theory where they complete an associated experiment to when they do not in order to understand if practical work does effect students’ knowledge of scientific concepts. In this work we aimed to address this gap by investigating the effect of students’ knowledge of organic mechanisms where they both perform and associated experiment and where they did not. Our results showed that organic chemistry experiments had no effect on students’ knowledge of organic mechanisms. These results support the view that there is little evidence to support the use of laboratory work to aid understanding of theory.","PeriodicalId":174795,"journal":{"name":"New directions in the teaching of physical sciences","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New directions in the teaching of physical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29311/ndtps.v0i15.3447","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The use of laboratory work to improve students’ knowledge of theory is one that is disputed. Student reflections of what they learn during practical work repeatedly show that students rarely think about theory. There is a lack of data that objectively compares students’ knowledge of theory where they complete an associated experiment to when they do not in order to understand if practical work does effect students’ knowledge of scientific concepts. In this work we aimed to address this gap by investigating the effect of students’ knowledge of organic mechanisms where they both perform and associated experiment and where they did not. Our results showed that organic chemistry experiments had no effect on students’ knowledge of organic mechanisms. These results support the view that there is little evidence to support the use of laboratory work to aid understanding of theory.
通过进行有机化学实验,调查学生对有机反应机理的理解
利用实验室工作来提高学生的理论知识是一个有争议的问题。学生在实际工作中反思所学知识的情况反复表明,学生很少思考理论。为了了解实际工作是否会影响学生对科学概念的认识,缺乏客观地比较学生完成相关实验和没有完成相关实验时的理论知识的数据。在这项工作中,我们旨在通过调查学生对有机机制的知识的影响来解决这一差距,他们都进行了相关的实验,而他们没有。结果表明,有机化学实验对学生对有机机理的认识没有影响。这些结果支持了这样一种观点,即几乎没有证据支持使用实验室工作来帮助理解理论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信