Reconstructing an International Organization: A Paradigm Shift in the World Trade Organization

Sungjoon Cho
{"title":"Reconstructing an International Organization: A Paradigm Shift in the World Trade Organization","authors":"Sungjoon Cho","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1823564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article argues that the old paradigm on international organizations (IOs) (Gesellschaft) characterized by realist political bargain cannot fully capture new social realities around contemporary IOs in which ideational factors, such as ideas, values, culture and norms, have become more salient and influential not only in explaining but also in prescribing state behaviors. In an attempt to address the old paradigm’s blind spots, the article offers a new paradigm informed by constructivism that highlights a reflective, intersubjective communication among IO members and consequent norm-building process. Under this new paradigm, one can understand an IO as a “community” (Gemeinschaft), not a mere contractual instrument of its contracting parties. The article applies the new paradigm to the WTO as it describes the WTO’s institutional evolution from a power-oriented, tariff-reducing contract to a norm-oriented world trading community. Critically, this article does not attempt to replace the old paradigm (realism) with the new one (constructivism) proposed here. Instead, the article endeavors to highlight the old paradigms’ structural weaknesses and offers a complimentary, rather than alternative, paradigm. Thus, an IO’s reality embraced jointly by these two paradigms may feature a “double helix” structure under which any single paradigm might not claim its disciplinary monopoly.","PeriodicalId":375754,"journal":{"name":"Public International Law eJournal","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public International Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1823564","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article argues that the old paradigm on international organizations (IOs) (Gesellschaft) characterized by realist political bargain cannot fully capture new social realities around contemporary IOs in which ideational factors, such as ideas, values, culture and norms, have become more salient and influential not only in explaining but also in prescribing state behaviors. In an attempt to address the old paradigm’s blind spots, the article offers a new paradigm informed by constructivism that highlights a reflective, intersubjective communication among IO members and consequent norm-building process. Under this new paradigm, one can understand an IO as a “community” (Gemeinschaft), not a mere contractual instrument of its contracting parties. The article applies the new paradigm to the WTO as it describes the WTO’s institutional evolution from a power-oriented, tariff-reducing contract to a norm-oriented world trading community. Critically, this article does not attempt to replace the old paradigm (realism) with the new one (constructivism) proposed here. Instead, the article endeavors to highlight the old paradigms’ structural weaknesses and offers a complimentary, rather than alternative, paradigm. Thus, an IO’s reality embraced jointly by these two paradigms may feature a “double helix” structure under which any single paradigm might not claim its disciplinary monopoly.
重构国际组织:世界贸易组织的范式转换
本文认为,以现实主义政治交易为特征的国际组织(Gesellschaft)的旧范式不能完全捕捉围绕当代国际组织的新社会现实,在当代国际组织中,观念因素,如思想、价值观、文化和规范,不仅在解释国家行为方面而且在规定国家行为方面变得更加突出和有影响力。为了解决旧范式的盲点,本文提出了一个以建构主义为基础的新范式,该范式强调了IO成员之间的反思性、主体间的沟通以及随之而来的规范构建过程。在这种新范式下,人们可以将IO理解为一个“社区”(Gemeinschaft),而不仅仅是其缔约方的合同工具。本文将新范式应用于世贸组织,描述了世贸组织从一个以权力为导向、降低关税的契约到一个以规范为导向的世界贸易共同体的制度演变。重要的是,本文并不试图用本文提出的新范式(建构主义)取代旧范式(现实主义)。相反,本文努力强调旧范式的结构性弱点,并提供了一个互补的范式,而不是替代的范式。因此,由这两种范式共同拥抱的IO现实可能具有“双螺旋”结构,在这种结构下,任何单一范式都不会声称其学科垄断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信