Supporting relationships in access control using role based access control

John F. Barkley, K. Beznosov, Jinny Uppal
{"title":"Supporting relationships in access control using role based access control","authors":"John F. Barkley, K. Beznosov, Jinny Uppal","doi":"10.1145/319171.319177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Role Based Access Control (RBAC) model and mechanism have proven to be useful and effective. This is clear from the many RBAC implementations in commercial products. However, there are many common examples where access decisions must include other factors, in particular, relationships between entities, such as, the user, the object to be accessed, and the subject of the information contained within the object. Such relationships are often not efficiently represented using traditional static security attributes centrally administered. Furthermore, the extension of RBAC models to include relationships obscures the fundamental RBAC metaphor. This paper furthers the concept of relationships for use in access control, and it shows how relationships can be supported in role based access decisions by using the Object Management Group’s (OMG) Resource Access Decision facility (RAD). This facility allows relationship information, which can dynamically change as part of normal application processing, to be used in access decisions by applications. By using RAD, the access decision logic is separate from application logic. In addition, RAD allows access decision logic from different models to be combined into a single access decision. Each access control model is thus able to retain its metaphor.","PeriodicalId":355233,"journal":{"name":"ACM Workshop on Role-Based Access Control","volume":"575 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"108","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Workshop on Role-Based Access Control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/319171.319177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 108

Abstract

The Role Based Access Control (RBAC) model and mechanism have proven to be useful and effective. This is clear from the many RBAC implementations in commercial products. However, there are many common examples where access decisions must include other factors, in particular, relationships between entities, such as, the user, the object to be accessed, and the subject of the information contained within the object. Such relationships are often not efficiently represented using traditional static security attributes centrally administered. Furthermore, the extension of RBAC models to include relationships obscures the fundamental RBAC metaphor. This paper furthers the concept of relationships for use in access control, and it shows how relationships can be supported in role based access decisions by using the Object Management Group’s (OMG) Resource Access Decision facility (RAD). This facility allows relationship information, which can dynamically change as part of normal application processing, to be used in access decisions by applications. By using RAD, the access decision logic is separate from application logic. In addition, RAD allows access decision logic from different models to be combined into a single access decision. Each access control model is thus able to retain its metaphor.
使用基于角色的访问控制支持访问控制中的关系
基于角色的访问控制(RBAC)模型和机制已被证明是有用和有效的。从商业产品中的许多RBAC实现中可以清楚地看出这一点。但是,在许多常见的示例中,访问决策必须包括其他因素,特别是实体之间的关系,例如用户、要访问的对象和对象中包含的信息的主题。使用集中管理的传统静态安全属性通常不能有效地表示这种关系。此外,扩展RBAC模型以包含关系模糊了基本的RBAC隐喻。本文进一步阐述了用于访问控制的关系概念,并展示了如何通过使用对象管理组(OMG)的资源访问决策工具(RAD)在基于角色的访问决策中支持关系。此功能允许应用程序在访问决策中使用关系信息,关系信息可以作为正常应用程序处理的一部分动态更改。通过使用RAD,访问决策逻辑与应用程序逻辑是分离的。此外,RAD允许将来自不同模型的访问决策逻辑组合到单个访问决策中。因此,每个访问控制模型都能够保留其隐喻。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信