The role of orthography in L2 segment and tone encoding by learners at different proficiency levels

Yen-Chen Hao, C. Yang
{"title":"The role of orthography in L2 segment and tone encoding by learners at different proficiency levels","authors":"Yen-Chen Hao, C. Yang","doi":"10.21437/tal.2018-50","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study compared the effect of two orthographic inputs on English speakers’ phonological encoding of Mandarin words: the Chinese Romanization Pinyin and Chinese characters. English speakers at three proficiency levels participated in a word-learning experiment. During the learning phase, half of the participants saw Pinyin of the target words (PY group), while the other half saw characters (CH group). After learning, the participants judged the matching of sound and meaning of 128 pairs, half of which were complete matches, while the other half mismatched the target either in segment or tone. The results showed that the Advanced learners in the CH group were more accurate than their counterparts in the PY group in rejecting tonal mismatches. In contrast, the Naïve participants in the PY group were more accurate in accepting the matches than those in the CH group. Moreover, participants in the PY group were overall insensitive to tonal mismatches regardless of their proficiency. In the CH group, however, the Advanced learners scored significantly higher with the tonal-mismatched items than the less experienced participants. This study suggests that characters are more effective than Pinyin in helping Advanced L2 learners encode the tones of new Mandarin words.","PeriodicalId":233495,"journal":{"name":"6th International Symposium on Tonal Aspects of Languages (TAL 2018)","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"6th International Symposium on Tonal Aspects of Languages (TAL 2018)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21437/tal.2018-50","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The present study compared the effect of two orthographic inputs on English speakers’ phonological encoding of Mandarin words: the Chinese Romanization Pinyin and Chinese characters. English speakers at three proficiency levels participated in a word-learning experiment. During the learning phase, half of the participants saw Pinyin of the target words (PY group), while the other half saw characters (CH group). After learning, the participants judged the matching of sound and meaning of 128 pairs, half of which were complete matches, while the other half mismatched the target either in segment or tone. The results showed that the Advanced learners in the CH group were more accurate than their counterparts in the PY group in rejecting tonal mismatches. In contrast, the Naïve participants in the PY group were more accurate in accepting the matches than those in the CH group. Moreover, participants in the PY group were overall insensitive to tonal mismatches regardless of their proficiency. In the CH group, however, the Advanced learners scored significantly higher with the tonal-mismatched items than the less experienced participants. This study suggests that characters are more effective than Pinyin in helping Advanced L2 learners encode the tones of new Mandarin words.
不同熟练程度学习者正字法在二语语段和声调编码中的作用
本研究比较了两种正字法输入对英语使用者汉语拼音和汉字语音编码的影响。三个熟练程度的英语使用者参加了一个单词学习实验。在学习阶段,一半的参与者看到目标单词的拼音(PY组),另一半参与者看到汉字(CH组)。学习后,参与者对128对语音和意义的匹配进行判断,其中一半是完全匹配的,而另一半则是在片段或音调上不匹配。结果表明,CH组的高阶学习者比PY组的高阶学习者对音调不匹配的拒绝更准确。相比之下,PY组的Naïve参与者比CH组的参与者更准确地接受匹配。此外,无论熟练程度如何,PY组的参与者总体上对音调不匹配不敏感。然而,在CH组中,高级学习者在音调不匹配项目上的得分明显高于经验不足的参与者。这项研究表明,汉字比拼音更有效地帮助高级二语学习者对新普通话单词的音调进行编码。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信