Comparison of consumer purchase intention between interactive and augmented reality shopping platforms through statistical analyses

Jasmina Stoyanova, P. Q. Brito, P. Georgieva, M. Milanova
{"title":"Comparison of consumer purchase intention between interactive and augmented reality shopping platforms through statistical analyses","authors":"Jasmina Stoyanova, P. Q. Brito, P. Georgieva, M. Milanova","doi":"10.1109/INISTA.2015.7276727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this study is to explore the effectiveness of three digital shopping platforms (Plain Interactive, Marker-based Augmented Reality and Markerless Augmented Reality), on the impressions and purchase intentions of consumers. The study is mainly interested in analysing whether intelligent shopping platforms with AR elements provide any added advantage to an advertised product in the form of favourable attitude or a stronger purchase impulse. During the tests with the three shopping platforms, quantitative data was collected via computerised questionnaire. High and Low class users were statistically extracted, corresponding to the high or low probability to buy or recommend the advertised brand. The results show that Markerless AR system clearly outperforms the Marker-based AR and the Plain Interactive in terms of positive attitude from the users. The second better performing system is the Marker-based AR, which closely follows the Markerless AR, while the Plain Interactive system obtains least approval.","PeriodicalId":136707,"journal":{"name":"2015 International Symposium on Innovations in Intelligent SysTems and Applications (INISTA)","volume":"105 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 International Symposium on Innovations in Intelligent SysTems and Applications (INISTA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/INISTA.2015.7276727","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

The objective of this study is to explore the effectiveness of three digital shopping platforms (Plain Interactive, Marker-based Augmented Reality and Markerless Augmented Reality), on the impressions and purchase intentions of consumers. The study is mainly interested in analysing whether intelligent shopping platforms with AR elements provide any added advantage to an advertised product in the form of favourable attitude or a stronger purchase impulse. During the tests with the three shopping platforms, quantitative data was collected via computerised questionnaire. High and Low class users were statistically extracted, corresponding to the high or low probability to buy or recommend the advertised brand. The results show that Markerless AR system clearly outperforms the Marker-based AR and the Plain Interactive in terms of positive attitude from the users. The second better performing system is the Marker-based AR, which closely follows the Markerless AR, while the Plain Interactive system obtains least approval.
通过统计分析对比互动式与增强现实购物平台的消费者购买意愿
本研究的目的是探讨三个数字购物平台(Plain Interactive,基于标记的增强现实和无标记的增强现实)对消费者印象和购买意愿的有效性。该研究的主要兴趣是分析具有AR元素的智能购物平台是否以有利的态度或更强的购买冲动的形式为广告产品提供任何额外的优势。在三个购物平台的测试中,通过计算机调查问卷收集定量数据。统计提取高、低等级用户,对应于购买或推荐广告品牌的高、低概率。结果表明,在用户的积极态度方面,无标记AR系统明显优于基于标记的AR系统和Plain Interactive系统。表现第二好的系统是基于标记的AR,紧随其后的是无标记的AR,而Plain Interactive系统获得的认可最少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信