Libraries and Diminished Patron Privacy During the COVID-19 Health Crisis

Christopher Muhawe, Ryan Wang, Tian Wang, C. Hayes, Masooda N. Bashir
{"title":"Libraries and Diminished Patron Privacy During the COVID-19 Health Crisis","authors":"Christopher Muhawe, Ryan Wang, Tian Wang, C. Hayes, Masooda N. Bashir","doi":"10.5860/jifp.v7i2.7729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The COVID-19 health crisis has ushered in an era of great change in the way individuals and institutions function. With the contagious and deadly nature of COVID-19, libraries geared their efforts to increase access to and use of digital collections. With the introduction of stay-home orders, the option of adopting full virtual services became the go-to solution as a way of protecting library staff and users. Collaboration with third-party vendors that provide online library services heightened like never before. As libraries reopened at a later point in the global pandemic, library staff were asked to conduct health screenings for patrons entering the library and actively monitor whether patrons were socially distanced in the library. The drastic change to library operations due to the pandemic resulted in the increased collection of patrons' personal information ranging from health information to location data coupled with library records. Much as librarians are traditionally and professionally committed to protecting their patrons' privacy, undertaking activities like health screening in the absence of data transparency practices can potentially impact library users' privacy. In this study, we investigated whether the 25 Association of Research Libraries (ARL) members with the largest number of titles held developed or modified their privacy policies in response to the increase in data collection during the COVID-19 health crisis. Privacy policies are living documents that should evolve with the times and thus should be updated or modified to reflect the current realities. We also examined whether pre-pandemic privacy policies, if any, of the surveyed 25 ARL member libraries are aligned with the privacy requirements outlined in the American Library Association (ALA) Privacy Toolkit (ALA 2014). Our results show that of the surveyed 25 ARL libraries, none of them developed a new library privacy policy or modified an existing one to reflect their data practices with specific regard to the new realities presented by the COVID-19 pandemic. The disregard for such adjustments to their privacy policies violated the principle of data transparency. Our results also show that, at the time of the survey, 4 of the surveyed 25 ARL members did not have library privacy policies.","PeriodicalId":301180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Freedom & Privacy","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual Freedom & Privacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5860/jifp.v7i2.7729","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The COVID-19 health crisis has ushered in an era of great change in the way individuals and institutions function. With the contagious and deadly nature of COVID-19, libraries geared their efforts to increase access to and use of digital collections. With the introduction of stay-home orders, the option of adopting full virtual services became the go-to solution as a way of protecting library staff and users. Collaboration with third-party vendors that provide online library services heightened like never before. As libraries reopened at a later point in the global pandemic, library staff were asked to conduct health screenings for patrons entering the library and actively monitor whether patrons were socially distanced in the library. The drastic change to library operations due to the pandemic resulted in the increased collection of patrons' personal information ranging from health information to location data coupled with library records. Much as librarians are traditionally and professionally committed to protecting their patrons' privacy, undertaking activities like health screening in the absence of data transparency practices can potentially impact library users' privacy. In this study, we investigated whether the 25 Association of Research Libraries (ARL) members with the largest number of titles held developed or modified their privacy policies in response to the increase in data collection during the COVID-19 health crisis. Privacy policies are living documents that should evolve with the times and thus should be updated or modified to reflect the current realities. We also examined whether pre-pandemic privacy policies, if any, of the surveyed 25 ARL member libraries are aligned with the privacy requirements outlined in the American Library Association (ALA) Privacy Toolkit (ALA 2014). Our results show that of the surveyed 25 ARL libraries, none of them developed a new library privacy policy or modified an existing one to reflect their data practices with specific regard to the new realities presented by the COVID-19 pandemic. The disregard for such adjustments to their privacy policies violated the principle of data transparency. Our results also show that, at the time of the survey, 4 of the surveyed 25 ARL members did not have library privacy policies.
COVID-19健康危机期间的图书馆和减少的用户隐私
2019冠状病毒病卫生危机开启了个人和机构运作方式发生巨大变化的时代。鉴于COVID-19具有传染性和致命性,图书馆努力增加数字馆藏的获取和使用。随着居家令的引入,采用全虚拟服务成为保护图书馆员工和用户的首选解决方案。与提供在线图书馆服务的第三方供应商的合作前所未有地加强。随着图书馆在全球大流行的后期重新开放,图书馆工作人员被要求对进入图书馆的顾客进行健康检查,并积极监测顾客是否在图书馆保持社交距离。由于新冠肺炎疫情,图书馆的运营发生了巨大变化,从健康信息到位置数据,再加上图书馆的记录,用户的个人信息被收集得越来越多。就像图书馆员传统上和专业上致力于保护其用户的隐私一样,在缺乏数据透明实践的情况下进行健康检查等活动可能会影响图书馆用户的隐私。在这项研究中,我们调查了拥有最多图书的25家研究图书馆协会(ARL)成员是否制定或修改了他们的隐私政策,以应对COVID-19卫生危机期间数据收集的增加。隐私政策是活的文件,应该随着时代而发展,因此应该更新或修改以反映当前的现实。我们还检查了被调查的25个ARL成员图书馆在大流行前的隐私政策(如果有的话)是否符合美国图书馆协会(ALA)隐私工具包(ALA 2014)中概述的隐私要求。我们的研究结果显示,在接受调查的25家ARL图书馆中,没有一家制定了新的图书馆隐私政策或修改了现有的隐私政策,以反映其数据实践,具体考虑到COVID-19大流行带来的新现实。无视这些公司隐私政策的调整,违反了数据透明的原则。我们的结果还显示,在调查的时候,25个被调查的ARL成员中有4个没有图书馆隐私政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信