Liberalising Temporary Movement of Natural Persons: An Agenda for the Development Round

L. Winters, T. Walmsley, Zhen Kun Wang, R. Grynberg
{"title":"Liberalising Temporary Movement of Natural Persons: An Agenda for the Development Round","authors":"L. Winters, T. Walmsley, Zhen Kun Wang, R. Grynberg","doi":"10.1111/1467-9701.00566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We discuss liberalising the temporary mobility of workers under Mode 4 of the GATS, particularly the movement of medium and low skilled service providers between developing and developed countries. Such mobility potentially offers huge returns: a flow equivalent to three per cent of developed countries? skilled and unskilled work forces would generate an estimated increase in world welfare of over US$150 billion, shared fairly equally between developing and developed countries. The larger part of this emanates from the less-skilled, essentially because losing higher-skilled workers cuts output in developing countries severely. The mass migration of less skilled workers raises fears in developed countries for cultural identity, problems of assimilation and the drain on the public purse. These fears are hardly relevant to temporary movement, however. The biggest economic concern from temporary mobility is its competitive challenge to local less skilled workers. But as populations age and the average levels of training and education rise, developed countries will face an increasing scarcity of less skilled labour. Temporary mobility thus actually offers a strong communality of interest between developing and developed countries. The remainder of the paper looks at the GATS provisions on Mode 4 and the commitments that have been made under it. The paper reviews several official proposals for the Doha talks, including the very detailed one from India, and considers several countries? existing schemes for the temporary movement of foreign workers. Many countries have long had bilateral foreign worker programmes, and some regional agreements provide for liberal and flexible movement. These show what is feasible and how concerns can be overcome. We caution that, to be useful, any WTO agreement must increase mobility, not just bureaucratise it. The paper concludes with some modest and practical proposals. We suggest, inter alia, that licensing firms to arrange the movement of labour is the most promising short-term approach to increasing temporary mobility.","PeriodicalId":448271,"journal":{"name":"Employment & Labor Law Abstracts eJournal","volume":"122 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"164","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Employment & Labor Law Abstracts eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9701.00566","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 164

Abstract

We discuss liberalising the temporary mobility of workers under Mode 4 of the GATS, particularly the movement of medium and low skilled service providers between developing and developed countries. Such mobility potentially offers huge returns: a flow equivalent to three per cent of developed countries? skilled and unskilled work forces would generate an estimated increase in world welfare of over US$150 billion, shared fairly equally between developing and developed countries. The larger part of this emanates from the less-skilled, essentially because losing higher-skilled workers cuts output in developing countries severely. The mass migration of less skilled workers raises fears in developed countries for cultural identity, problems of assimilation and the drain on the public purse. These fears are hardly relevant to temporary movement, however. The biggest economic concern from temporary mobility is its competitive challenge to local less skilled workers. But as populations age and the average levels of training and education rise, developed countries will face an increasing scarcity of less skilled labour. Temporary mobility thus actually offers a strong communality of interest between developing and developed countries. The remainder of the paper looks at the GATS provisions on Mode 4 and the commitments that have been made under it. The paper reviews several official proposals for the Doha talks, including the very detailed one from India, and considers several countries? existing schemes for the temporary movement of foreign workers. Many countries have long had bilateral foreign worker programmes, and some regional agreements provide for liberal and flexible movement. These show what is feasible and how concerns can be overcome. We caution that, to be useful, any WTO agreement must increase mobility, not just bureaucratise it. The paper concludes with some modest and practical proposals. We suggest, inter alia, that licensing firms to arrange the movement of labour is the most promising short-term approach to increasing temporary mobility.
放宽自然人临时流动:发展回合议程
我们将讨论在服务贸易总协定模式4下开放工人的临时流动,特别是发展中国家和发达国家之间的中低技能服务提供者的流动。这种流动性可能带来巨大回报:相当于发达国家的3% ?据估计,熟练和非熟练劳动力将使世界福利增加1500亿美元以上,发展中国家和发达国家之间相当平均地分享。其中很大一部分是低技能工人造成的,主要是因为高技能工人的流失严重削减了发展中国家的产出。低技能工人的大规模移民在发达国家引发了对文化认同、同化问题和公共财政流失的担忧。然而,这些担忧与暂时的流动几乎没有关系。临时流动带来的最大经济担忧是它对当地低技能工人的竞争挑战。但随着人口老龄化以及平均培训和教育水平的提高,发达国家将面临低技能劳动力日益短缺的问题。因此,临时流动实际上提供了发展中国家和发达国家之间强烈的共同利益。本文件的其余部分探讨服务贸易总协定关于模式4的规定和根据该规定作出的承诺。该报告回顾了多哈谈判的几项官方提议,包括印度提出的非常详细的提议,并考虑了几个国家?现有的外国工人临时流动计划。许多国家长期以来都有双边外国工人方案,一些区域协定规定自由和灵活的流动。这表明了什么是可行的,以及如何克服担忧。我们警告说,要发挥作用,任何WTO协议都必须增加流动性,而不仅仅是将其官僚化。最后,本文提出了一些实用的建议。我们建议,除其他外,授权公司安排劳动力流动是增加临时流动性的最有希望的短期方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信