The Dominant Structures of the Times: Late Victorian Tragedy as Critique of Romantic Ideology

A. Elsherif
{"title":"The Dominant Structures of the Times: Late Victorian Tragedy as Critique of Romantic Ideology","authors":"A. Elsherif","doi":"10.21608/jfafu.2023.184336.1853","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In their attempt to move beyond the Enlightenment, Romantic writers formulated a worldview which recreated the theological unity of being on the plane of immanence. This intellectual unity was imposed on the deeply divided Victorian society which was described by Benjamin Disraeli, the British prime minister, as ―the two nations.‖ Imposing a unified intellectual framework on a sharply divided society without being able to develop it from within is bound to merely cover the division with an ideological smokescreen. This study explores how romantic ideology manifests itself in the dominant form of Romantic realism in the fiction of early Victorian writers. It, then, investigates the dominant form of late Victorian fiction in order to prove that it functions as ideology critique. Romantic fiction in the early Victorian period, on the one hand, attempts to unify the individual and society, man and nature and the different social classes through showing how they are permeated by a unifying spirit. The form of late Victorian tragedy, on the other hand, which shows the opposition between the individual and society, man and nature and the social classes is the result of debunking the faith in unity as merely ideological. When unity is exposed as merely ideological, what remains is the opposition in which the individual is defeated in his struggle against a greater power, creating, thereby, the distinctive form of tragedy. Late Victorian tragedy is, hence, the exposition of oppositions without unification.","PeriodicalId":296125,"journal":{"name":"مجلة کلیة الآداب جامعة الفیوم","volume":"180 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"مجلة کلیة الآداب جامعة الفیوم","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/jfafu.2023.184336.1853","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In their attempt to move beyond the Enlightenment, Romantic writers formulated a worldview which recreated the theological unity of being on the plane of immanence. This intellectual unity was imposed on the deeply divided Victorian society which was described by Benjamin Disraeli, the British prime minister, as ―the two nations.‖ Imposing a unified intellectual framework on a sharply divided society without being able to develop it from within is bound to merely cover the division with an ideological smokescreen. This study explores how romantic ideology manifests itself in the dominant form of Romantic realism in the fiction of early Victorian writers. It, then, investigates the dominant form of late Victorian fiction in order to prove that it functions as ideology critique. Romantic fiction in the early Victorian period, on the one hand, attempts to unify the individual and society, man and nature and the different social classes through showing how they are permeated by a unifying spirit. The form of late Victorian tragedy, on the other hand, which shows the opposition between the individual and society, man and nature and the social classes is the result of debunking the faith in unity as merely ideological. When unity is exposed as merely ideological, what remains is the opposition in which the individual is defeated in his struggle against a greater power, creating, thereby, the distinctive form of tragedy. Late Victorian tragedy is, hence, the exposition of oppositions without unification.
时代的主导结构:作为浪漫主义意识形态批判的维多利亚晚期悲剧
在他们试图超越启蒙运动的过程中,浪漫主义作家制定了一种世界观,重新创造了内在层面上的神学统一。这种思想上的统一被强加于分裂严重的维多利亚社会,英国首相本杰明•迪斯雷利(Benjamin Disraeli)将其描述为两个国家。‖把一个统一的知识框架强加于一个严重分裂的社会,而不能从内部发展它,注定只是用意识形态的烟幕掩盖分裂。本研究探讨了浪漫主义意识形态如何在早期维多利亚作家的小说中以浪漫现实主义的主导形式表现出来。然后,它调查了维多利亚晚期小说的主要形式,以证明它具有意识形态批判的功能。维多利亚时期早期的浪漫主义小说一方面试图通过表现一种统一精神的渗透,将个人与社会、人与自然、不同的社会阶层统一起来;另一方面,维多利亚时代晚期的悲剧表现了个人与社会、人与自然、社会阶级之间的对立,这是揭穿统一信仰仅仅是意识形态的结果。当统一被暴露为仅仅是意识形态的统一时,剩下的就是对立,在这种对立中,个人在与更强大的力量的斗争中被击败,从而创造出独特的悲剧形式。因此,维多利亚晚期的悲剧是没有统一的对立的阐述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信