{"title":"Influence of learning styles and academic achievement on performance and preference in different learning modes: An adaptive hypermedia approach","authors":"A. Hazra, P. Patnaik, Damodar Suar","doi":"10.1109/IHCI.2012.6481811","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the efficacy of Felder-Silverman's learning styles and Mayer's generative theory of multimedia learning for adaptive hypermedia using three different modes of presentations-verbal, visual, and multimedia- in history and engineering disciplines. Six modules in history and engineering were designed in verbal, visual and multimedia modes. Hundred and four undergraduate students of the Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur participated and completed the six modules. The performance in each module was assessed on the basis of recall, recognition, comprehension, and transfer of learning. Based on Inventory of Learning Styles, learners were categorized in visual-verbal and sequential-global dimensions. The verbal, neutral, and visual learners and the sequential, neutral, and global learners did not differ in performance across disciplines. Learners' performance in visual mode for history and in multimedia mode for engineering was found to be superior to other modes. High academic achievers performed better for recognition and comprehension dimensions in history, and recognition dimension in engineering than low academic achievers. Irrespective of learning styles or academic achievements students preferred and found more appropriate visual and multimedia modes over verbal mode of learning. We believe that the null results for learning styles suggest their limited usability for adaptive hypermedia. Similarly, Mayer's multimedia learning cannot be recommended as the most effective mode of learning for all disciplines. We suggest that adaptivity according to disciplines is an important area that needs to be explored.","PeriodicalId":107245,"journal":{"name":"2012 4th International Conference on Intelligent Human Computer Interaction (IHCI)","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 4th International Conference on Intelligent Human Computer Interaction (IHCI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IHCI.2012.6481811","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Abstract
This paper examines the efficacy of Felder-Silverman's learning styles and Mayer's generative theory of multimedia learning for adaptive hypermedia using three different modes of presentations-verbal, visual, and multimedia- in history and engineering disciplines. Six modules in history and engineering were designed in verbal, visual and multimedia modes. Hundred and four undergraduate students of the Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur participated and completed the six modules. The performance in each module was assessed on the basis of recall, recognition, comprehension, and transfer of learning. Based on Inventory of Learning Styles, learners were categorized in visual-verbal and sequential-global dimensions. The verbal, neutral, and visual learners and the sequential, neutral, and global learners did not differ in performance across disciplines. Learners' performance in visual mode for history and in multimedia mode for engineering was found to be superior to other modes. High academic achievers performed better for recognition and comprehension dimensions in history, and recognition dimension in engineering than low academic achievers. Irrespective of learning styles or academic achievements students preferred and found more appropriate visual and multimedia modes over verbal mode of learning. We believe that the null results for learning styles suggest their limited usability for adaptive hypermedia. Similarly, Mayer's multimedia learning cannot be recommended as the most effective mode of learning for all disciplines. We suggest that adaptivity according to disciplines is an important area that needs to be explored.
本文考察了Felder-Silverman的学习风格和Mayer的多媒体学习生成理论在历史和工程学科中对自适应超媒体的有效性,使用了三种不同的呈现模式——语言、视觉和多媒体。历史和工程六个模块分别以文字、视觉和多媒体的方式进行设计。印度理工学院(Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur)的104名本科生参与并完成了这六个模块。每个模块的表现是根据回忆、识别、理解和学习迁移来评估的。以学习风格量表为基础,将学习者分为视觉-语言和顺序-全局两个维度。语言型、中性型和视觉型学习者以及顺序型、中性型和全局型学习者在不同学科的表现上没有差异。历史课程的视觉模式和工程课程的多媒体模式的学习成绩均优于其他模式。学业成绩高的学生在历史学科的认知维度、理解维度和工程学科的认知维度上的表现优于学业成绩低的学生。无论学习风格或学业成绩如何,学生都更喜欢并发现视觉和多媒体模式比口头学习模式更合适。我们认为学习风格的无效结果表明它们在自适应超媒体中的可用性有限。同样,梅耶尔的多媒体学习也不能被推荐为所有学科最有效的学习模式。我们认为根据学科的适应性是一个需要探索的重要领域。