Is Senegal still the African exception? Sufism and democracy revisited

M. Leichtman
{"title":"Is Senegal still the African exception? Sufism and democracy revisited","authors":"M. Leichtman","doi":"10.1080/20566093.2016.1222731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Tolerance, Democracy, and Sufis in Senegal is the edited volume resulting from a 2008 conference held at Columbia University to celebrate the reopening of the Institute of African Studies, directed by Mamadou Diouf. The 10 chapters, including an introduction, reinterpret Senegal’s history and politics in terms of the so-called “Senegalese exception” of a stable African democracy among neighbors plagued by military coups, civil wars, and ethnic conflicts. Senegal managed to have a peaceful and democratic transition of power, making the West African country a positive example of good African leadership. First put forward by Donal Cruise O’Brien, the “social contract” theory between marabout (Sufi Islamic leader) and talibe (disciple), as well as between the marabouts and the state, is the foundation of Senegalese stability. The volume revisits this theory with fresh interdisciplinary analysis and an acknowledgement of the agency of talibes (often undermined in the earlier scholarship). The Introduction highlights Sufi Islam as an “antidote to political Islam,” in particular the Senegalese model of pluralism, cooperation, coexistence, and tolerance. This volume offers a “longue durée perspective” that traces the development of what Diouf refers to as Senegal’s “Islamo-Wolof model”, the “political, social, and cultural arrangements (infrastructures and ideologies) that have been supporting the operations of the colonial and the postcolonial states and providing the sources and resources for the legitimacy of their power” (ch. 1, n 27). This began in the French colonial period with the marabouts becoming vital intermediaries, religiously and administratively, between the colonial state and rural masses. Chapters deliver a variety of approaches grounded in different disciplines and methodologies and ranging from Senegal’s past to the present day. Chapter 2 presents Souleymane Bachir Diagne’s philosophical contribution on the assumed challenges presented to Muslim societies by secularization, which emerged as a criticism of Islam by nineteenth-century thinkers such as Ernest Renan who regarded Islam as incompatible with science. Diagne traces the foundations of the “spiritual socialism” of Senegal’s first president Leopold Sedar Senghor and his prime minister Mamadou Dia. Senegal’s founding fathers played a crucial role in defining the Senegalese state’s laïcité (a specific French-inspired brand of secularism), which Catholic Senghor modeled after the intellectual discourse of Muslim elites such as Al-Afghani, Muhammad Abdu, and Muhammad Iqbal. Diagne concludes with a quote from Senegal’s second president, Abdou","PeriodicalId":252085,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Religious and Political Practice","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Religious and Political Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20566093.2016.1222731","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Tolerance, Democracy, and Sufis in Senegal is the edited volume resulting from a 2008 conference held at Columbia University to celebrate the reopening of the Institute of African Studies, directed by Mamadou Diouf. The 10 chapters, including an introduction, reinterpret Senegal’s history and politics in terms of the so-called “Senegalese exception” of a stable African democracy among neighbors plagued by military coups, civil wars, and ethnic conflicts. Senegal managed to have a peaceful and democratic transition of power, making the West African country a positive example of good African leadership. First put forward by Donal Cruise O’Brien, the “social contract” theory between marabout (Sufi Islamic leader) and talibe (disciple), as well as between the marabouts and the state, is the foundation of Senegalese stability. The volume revisits this theory with fresh interdisciplinary analysis and an acknowledgement of the agency of talibes (often undermined in the earlier scholarship). The Introduction highlights Sufi Islam as an “antidote to political Islam,” in particular the Senegalese model of pluralism, cooperation, coexistence, and tolerance. This volume offers a “longue durée perspective” that traces the development of what Diouf refers to as Senegal’s “Islamo-Wolof model”, the “political, social, and cultural arrangements (infrastructures and ideologies) that have been supporting the operations of the colonial and the postcolonial states and providing the sources and resources for the legitimacy of their power” (ch. 1, n 27). This began in the French colonial period with the marabouts becoming vital intermediaries, religiously and administratively, between the colonial state and rural masses. Chapters deliver a variety of approaches grounded in different disciplines and methodologies and ranging from Senegal’s past to the present day. Chapter 2 presents Souleymane Bachir Diagne’s philosophical contribution on the assumed challenges presented to Muslim societies by secularization, which emerged as a criticism of Islam by nineteenth-century thinkers such as Ernest Renan who regarded Islam as incompatible with science. Diagne traces the foundations of the “spiritual socialism” of Senegal’s first president Leopold Sedar Senghor and his prime minister Mamadou Dia. Senegal’s founding fathers played a crucial role in defining the Senegalese state’s laïcité (a specific French-inspired brand of secularism), which Catholic Senghor modeled after the intellectual discourse of Muslim elites such as Al-Afghani, Muhammad Abdu, and Muhammad Iqbal. Diagne concludes with a quote from Senegal’s second president, Abdou
塞内加尔仍然是非洲的例外吗?苏菲主义和民主重新审视
《塞内加尔的宽容、民主与苏菲派》是2008年哥伦比亚大学为庆祝非洲研究所重新开放而举行的会议的编辑成果,该会议由Mamadou Diouf主持。包括导言在内的10个章节,从所谓的“塞内加尔例外”的角度,重新解读了塞内加尔的历史和政治。塞内加尔是一个稳定的非洲民主国家,邻国饱受军事政变、内战和种族冲突的困扰。塞内加尔成功地实现了和平民主的权力过渡,使这个西非国家成为非洲优秀领导的积极榜样。由Donal Cruise O 'Brien首先提出的marabout(苏菲派伊斯兰领袖)和talibe(信徒)之间,以及marabout和国家之间的“社会契约”理论,是塞内加尔稳定的基础。卷重新审视这一理论与新的跨学科的分析和承认机构的塔利班(往往在早期的学术破坏)。导言强调苏菲伊斯兰是“政治伊斯兰的解毒剂”,特别是塞内加尔多元主义、合作、共存和宽容的模式。这一卷提供了一个“长期的生存空间”,追溯了迪乌夫所说的塞内加尔“伊斯兰-沃洛夫模式”的发展,即“支持殖民和后殖民国家运作的政治、社会和文化安排(基础设施和意识形态),并为其权力的合法性提供了来源和资源”(第1章,第27页)。这始于法国殖民时期,马约成为殖民地国家和农村群众之间重要的宗教和行政媒介。章节提供了基于不同学科和方法的各种方法,范围从塞内加尔的过去到现在。第二章介绍了Souleymane Bachir Diagne对世俗化给穆斯林社会带来的挑战的哲学贡献,世俗化是19世纪思想家对伊斯兰教的批评,如Ernest Renan,他认为伊斯兰教与科学不相容。迪亚涅追溯了塞内加尔首任总统利奥波德·塞达尔·桑戈尔及其总理马马杜·迪亚的“精神社会主义”基础。塞内加尔的开国元勋们在定义塞内加尔国家laïcité(一种受法国启发的世俗主义品牌)方面发挥了至关重要的作用,天主教的桑戈尔模仿了阿富汗尼、穆罕默德·阿卜杜和穆罕默德·伊克巴尔等穆斯林精英的思想话语。迪亚涅最后引用了塞内加尔第二任总统阿卜杜的话
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信