Eine Frage des Stils?

Florian Berding, Maike Irmscher, Maike Vossmann, Anna Gores
{"title":"Eine Frage des Stils?","authors":"Florian Berding, Maike Irmscher, Maike Vossmann, Anna Gores","doi":"10.24894/2673-4419.00057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the next years digital technologies change business professions. Activities within accounting and office work decrease whereas complex, uncertain strategical decisions and marketing activities increase. This development demands traders to create innovative solutions and to acquire the necessary knowledge autonomously. They way traders construct their knowledge depends on their beliefs about knowledge and knowing and on their thinking styles. Epistemic beliefs determine the criteria for selecting, evaluating, and accepting information as knowledge whereas thinking styles characterize the preferred way in engaging problems and dealing with tasks. The aim of this paper is to explore how epistemic beliefs and thinking styles can be combined into individual procedures of constructing knowledge. The study investigates how these individual procedures influence learning success, and how these procedures prepare apprentices for dealing with future demands. 236 prospective wholesalers and 295 retailers participated in the study. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis identified four thinking styles for marketing and accounting: innovation, tradition, conformity, and teamwork. These styles explain about 7 % of the variance in the grades for accounting. Based on these four styles and the epistemic beliefs latent profile analysis reveals three groups of apprentices: the flexible, the average, and the discussant. These groups explain about 4 % of the variance for the grades in marketing and accounting. The paper concludes that trading apprentices have several resources for dealing with future demands. Recommendations for supporting learning within the three groups are outlined.","PeriodicalId":338021,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift für Berufs- und Wirtschaftspädagogik","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift für Berufs- und Wirtschaftspädagogik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24894/2673-4419.00057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In the next years digital technologies change business professions. Activities within accounting and office work decrease whereas complex, uncertain strategical decisions and marketing activities increase. This development demands traders to create innovative solutions and to acquire the necessary knowledge autonomously. They way traders construct their knowledge depends on their beliefs about knowledge and knowing and on their thinking styles. Epistemic beliefs determine the criteria for selecting, evaluating, and accepting information as knowledge whereas thinking styles characterize the preferred way in engaging problems and dealing with tasks. The aim of this paper is to explore how epistemic beliefs and thinking styles can be combined into individual procedures of constructing knowledge. The study investigates how these individual procedures influence learning success, and how these procedures prepare apprentices for dealing with future demands. 236 prospective wholesalers and 295 retailers participated in the study. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis identified four thinking styles for marketing and accounting: innovation, tradition, conformity, and teamwork. These styles explain about 7 % of the variance in the grades for accounting. Based on these four styles and the epistemic beliefs latent profile analysis reveals three groups of apprentices: the flexible, the average, and the discussant. These groups explain about 4 % of the variance for the grades in marketing and accounting. The paper concludes that trading apprentices have several resources for dealing with future demands. Recommendations for supporting learning within the three groups are outlined.
需要奇怪的风格?
在接下来的几年里,数字技术将改变商业行业。会计和办公室工作活动减少,而复杂、不确定的战略决策和营销活动增加。这种发展要求交易者创造创新的解决方案,并自主获取必要的知识。交易员构建知识的方式取决于他们对知识和认知的信念以及他们的思维方式。认知信念决定了选择、评估和接受信息作为知识的标准,而思维方式则表征了解决问题和处理任务的首选方式。本文的目的是探讨如何将认知信念和思维方式结合到构建知识的个人过程中。本研究探讨这些个别程序如何影响学习成功,以及这些程序如何为学徒应对未来的需求做好准备。236名潜在批发商和295名零售商参与了这项研究。探索性和验证性因素分析确定了营销和会计的四种思维方式:创新、传统、整合和团队合作。这些风格解释了大约7%的会计成绩差异。基于这四种风格和认知信念,潜在轮廓分析揭示了三组学徒:灵活型,平均型和讨论者。这些群体解释了市场营销和会计成绩4%的差异。本文的结论是,贸易学徒有几个资源来应对未来的需求。本文概述了支持这三个小组学习的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信