The Socialist Experience in Greece

L. Lefeber
{"title":"The Socialist Experience in Greece","authors":"L. Lefeber","doi":"10.1080/08911916.1989.11643783","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Greek experience under the government of the party of the Panhellenic Socialist Movement (PASOK) is so complex, and its ramifications so varied, that an exhaustive discussion cannot be undertaken within the limits of an essay: it would require a book. Furthermore, at the time of writing, the experience is not yet over. In what follows, I attempt to give only an overview of the implications of, and responses to, some of the inherited social and economic conditions and other constraints that I believe to be basic for understanding the dynamics of the successes and failures of the PASOK government.1 Even though questions have been raised about PASOK's concept of socialism, or the commitment of its leadership to it, Greek social and political conditions have changed for the better during the tenure of the PASOK government. But because most of these changes have been limited in scope, it is important to ask whether it would have been possible to do better than what the record indicates. Ultimately, one would like to know whether it is possible to transform progressively, or socialize, a society in a semi-industrialized country, such as Greece, that is incorporated into and depends on the mechanics of the international capitalist system. This question goes beyond the Greek experience itself. But if on whatever basis the answer is affirmative, then one must ask whether the transformation to democratic socialism is feasible by democratic means. Given the recent experience not only in Greece, but also in some Latin American and Asian countries, I believe that positive answers to both these questions require an element of faith.2","PeriodicalId":180565,"journal":{"name":"Socialist Dilemmas","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Socialist Dilemmas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08911916.1989.11643783","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The Greek experience under the government of the party of the Panhellenic Socialist Movement (PASOK) is so complex, and its ramifications so varied, that an exhaustive discussion cannot be undertaken within the limits of an essay: it would require a book. Furthermore, at the time of writing, the experience is not yet over. In what follows, I attempt to give only an overview of the implications of, and responses to, some of the inherited social and economic conditions and other constraints that I believe to be basic for understanding the dynamics of the successes and failures of the PASOK government.1 Even though questions have been raised about PASOK's concept of socialism, or the commitment of its leadership to it, Greek social and political conditions have changed for the better during the tenure of the PASOK government. But because most of these changes have been limited in scope, it is important to ask whether it would have been possible to do better than what the record indicates. Ultimately, one would like to know whether it is possible to transform progressively, or socialize, a society in a semi-industrialized country, such as Greece, that is incorporated into and depends on the mechanics of the international capitalist system. This question goes beyond the Greek experience itself. But if on whatever basis the answer is affirmative, then one must ask whether the transformation to democratic socialism is feasible by democratic means. Given the recent experience not only in Greece, but also in some Latin American and Asian countries, I believe that positive answers to both these questions require an element of faith.2
希腊的社会主义经验
泛希腊社会主义运动党(泛希腊社会主义运动党)执政下的希腊经历是如此复杂,其后果是如此多样,以至于在一篇文章的范围内无法进行详尽的讨论:这需要一本书。此外,在撰写本文时,这种经历还没有结束。在接下来的内容中,我试图只概述一些继承下来的社会和经济条件以及其他制约因素的影响和反应,我认为这些制约因素是理解泛希社运政府成功与失败的基本动力尽管人们对泛希社运的社会主义概念及其领导层的承诺提出了质疑,但在泛希社运政府执政期间,希腊的社会和政治状况已经变得更好。但是,由于这些变化中的大多数在范围上都是有限的,因此重要的是要问,是否有可能做得比记录显示的更好。最后,人们想知道,在一个半工业化国家,如希腊,是否有可能逐步改造或社会化一个融入并依赖于国际资本主义体系机制的社会。这个问题超出了希腊经验本身。但是,无论根据什么理由,如果答案是肯定的,那么就必须问,通过民主手段向民主社会主义的转变是否可行。考虑到最近不仅在希腊,而且在一些拉丁美洲和亚洲国家的经验,我认为对这两个问题的积极回答需要有信念的因素
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信