U.S. Education and Training Policy: A Re-evaluation of the Underlying Assumptions Behind the "New Consensus"

J. Heckman, Rebecca L. Roselius, J. Smith
{"title":"U.S. Education and Training Policy: A Re-evaluation of the Underlying Assumptions Behind the \"New Consensus\"","authors":"J. Heckman, Rebecca L. Roselius, J. Smith","doi":"10.4324/9780429046834-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In response to rising wage inequality and lower real wages for low-skill workers over the last decade, a \"new consensus\" has emerged that questions the ability of American schools and firms to educate and train workers, especially non-college bound youth. The remedies proposed by proponents of the new consensus include implementing an apprenticeship system patterned after programs in Germany, creating a nation-wide system of vocational credentialing and increasing the availability of government training programs. In this paper, we critically examine the assumptions underlying the current proposals. We do not find empirical or theoretical justification for many of the proposed programs. While some of these programs aim toward desirable ends, other more efficient, less costly means exist to attain their objectives.","PeriodicalId":297763,"journal":{"name":"Labor Markets, Employment Policy, and Job Creation","volume":"76 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Labor Markets, Employment Policy, and Job Creation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429046834-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

In response to rising wage inequality and lower real wages for low-skill workers over the last decade, a "new consensus" has emerged that questions the ability of American schools and firms to educate and train workers, especially non-college bound youth. The remedies proposed by proponents of the new consensus include implementing an apprenticeship system patterned after programs in Germany, creating a nation-wide system of vocational credentialing and increasing the availability of government training programs. In this paper, we critically examine the assumptions underlying the current proposals. We do not find empirical or theoretical justification for many of the proposed programs. While some of these programs aim toward desirable ends, other more efficient, less costly means exist to attain their objectives.
美国教育与培训政策:重新评估“新共识”背后的基本假设
在过去十年中,随着工资不平等的加剧和低技能工人实际工资的降低,一种“新共识”已经出现,质疑美国学校和公司教育和培训工人的能力,尤其是没有上大学的年轻人。新共识的支持者提出的补救措施包括,效仿德国的项目,实施学徒制度,建立全国性的职业资格认证体系,增加政府培训项目的可用性。在本文中,我们严格审查当前建议的假设。我们没有找到许多拟议计划的经验或理论依据。虽然其中一些计划旨在达到理想的目的,但存在其他更有效,成本更低的手段来实现其目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信