Tight Weight-dependent Competitive Ratios for Online Edge-weighted Bipartite Matching and Beyond

Will Ma, D. Simchi-Levi
{"title":"Tight Weight-dependent Competitive Ratios for Online Edge-weighted Bipartite Matching and Beyond","authors":"Will Ma, D. Simchi-Levi","doi":"10.1145/3328526.3329636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We consider the general problem of selling a limited inventory of items to heterogeneous customers who arrive sequentially, and analyze the competitive ratio under adversarial arrivals. Previous work in this area, motivated by online matching, advertising, and assortment problems, has considered the case where each item can be sold at only a single price. This work has culminated in two classes of algorithms: \"balance'' algorithms, which achieve the best-possible competitive ratio of 1-1/e in an asymptotic large-inventory (\"small bids\") regime; and \"ranking'' algorithms, which achieve the best-possible competitive ratio of 1-1/e in the deterministic case of online matching. In this paper, we extend both of these classes of results to allow for items to have multiple feasible prices. Our algorithms introduce the idea of \"booking limits'' from revenue management and integrate them into the multiplicative penalty functions used for online matching and allocation problems. Our algorithms achieve the best-possible weight-dependent competitive ratios, which depend on the sets of feasible prices given in advance. To establish this tightness, we show that by optimizing our additive \"value function'' used to make allocation decisions, the resulting objective value is the same as that of an adversary's optimization problem for designing a weighted upper-triangular graph. Our \"balance'' algorithm and its analysis further use a randomly-perturbed version of this value function; aside from being asymptotically optimal, they improve the best-known dependence of the competitive ratio on the starting inventory amounts.","PeriodicalId":416173,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on Economics and Computation","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on Economics and Computation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3328526.3329636","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

We consider the general problem of selling a limited inventory of items to heterogeneous customers who arrive sequentially, and analyze the competitive ratio under adversarial arrivals. Previous work in this area, motivated by online matching, advertising, and assortment problems, has considered the case where each item can be sold at only a single price. This work has culminated in two classes of algorithms: "balance'' algorithms, which achieve the best-possible competitive ratio of 1-1/e in an asymptotic large-inventory ("small bids") regime; and "ranking'' algorithms, which achieve the best-possible competitive ratio of 1-1/e in the deterministic case of online matching. In this paper, we extend both of these classes of results to allow for items to have multiple feasible prices. Our algorithms introduce the idea of "booking limits'' from revenue management and integrate them into the multiplicative penalty functions used for online matching and allocation problems. Our algorithms achieve the best-possible weight-dependent competitive ratios, which depend on the sets of feasible prices given in advance. To establish this tightness, we show that by optimizing our additive "value function'' used to make allocation decisions, the resulting objective value is the same as that of an adversary's optimization problem for designing a weighted upper-triangular graph. Our "balance'' algorithm and its analysis further use a randomly-perturbed version of this value function; aside from being asymptotically optimal, they improve the best-known dependence of the competitive ratio on the starting inventory amounts.
在线边加权二部匹配及其他紧密权重依赖竞争比
我们考虑了向顺序到达的异质顾客销售有限库存商品的一般问题,并分析了敌对到达条件下的竞争比。这一领域以前的工作受到在线匹配、广告和分类问题的激励,考虑了每件商品只能以单一价格出售的情况。这项工作在两类算法中达到了高潮:“平衡”算法,它在渐近大库存(“小出价”)制度下实现了1-1/e的最佳竞争比;“排名”算法,在确定的在线匹配情况下,达到1-1/e的最佳竞争比。在本文中,我们扩展了这两类结果,以允许项目具有多个可行价格。我们的算法从收入管理中引入了“预订限制”的概念,并将其整合到用于在线匹配和分配问题的乘法惩罚函数中。我们的算法实现了最佳的权重相关竞争比率,这取决于预先给定的可行价格集。为了建立这种紧密性,我们证明了通过优化我们用于分配决策的附加“价值函数”,得到的目标值与对手设计加权上三角图的优化问题的目标值相同。我们的“平衡”算法及其分析进一步使用了这个价值函数的随机扰动版本;除了渐近最优之外,它们还改进了众所周知的竞争比率对初始库存数量的依赖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信