{"title":"Including unpaid household activities","authors":"P. Ven, Jorrit Zwijnenburg, Matthew De Queljoe","doi":"10.1787/BC9D30DC-EN","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The System of National Accounts, which provides information on important macroeconomic indicators such as Gross Domestic Product (GDP), household disposable income and final consumption, typically excludes the value of unpaid household activities. Exceptions are made for the production of goods for own final consumption (e.g. subsistence farming), the services from owner-occupied dwellings, and the production from employment of paid domestic staff, but the output from unpaid domestic and personal services, such as the preparation of meals, taking care of children, cleaning, repairs, volunteering, etc., is all excluded. This report deals with the impact of including unpaid household activities on macro-economic aggregates for G7-countries. It builds upon earlier work by Ahmad and Koh (2011) and van de Ven and Zwijnenburg (2016). The report starts off with discussing the pros and cons of including unpaid household activities, or more specifically, the reasons why these activities are currently excluded from the macro-economic aggregates that can be derived from the framework of national accounts. It then discusses how estimates can be compiled using statistics from time use surveys and other available information. Here, also some of the complexities related to the approximate valuation of unpaid household activities are being addressed. Subsequently, results are presented for the level estimates of GDP as well as for economic growth when including the value of unpaid household activities for the G7 economies. The report concludes with a number of recommendations on the way forward, also touching upon some of the (potential) policy implications of the work on valuing unpaid household activities.","PeriodicalId":196193,"journal":{"name":"OECD Statistics Working Papers","volume":"518 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OECD Statistics Working Papers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1787/BC9D30DC-EN","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9
Abstract
The System of National Accounts, which provides information on important macroeconomic indicators such as Gross Domestic Product (GDP), household disposable income and final consumption, typically excludes the value of unpaid household activities. Exceptions are made for the production of goods for own final consumption (e.g. subsistence farming), the services from owner-occupied dwellings, and the production from employment of paid domestic staff, but the output from unpaid domestic and personal services, such as the preparation of meals, taking care of children, cleaning, repairs, volunteering, etc., is all excluded. This report deals with the impact of including unpaid household activities on macro-economic aggregates for G7-countries. It builds upon earlier work by Ahmad and Koh (2011) and van de Ven and Zwijnenburg (2016). The report starts off with discussing the pros and cons of including unpaid household activities, or more specifically, the reasons why these activities are currently excluded from the macro-economic aggregates that can be derived from the framework of national accounts. It then discusses how estimates can be compiled using statistics from time use surveys and other available information. Here, also some of the complexities related to the approximate valuation of unpaid household activities are being addressed. Subsequently, results are presented for the level estimates of GDP as well as for economic growth when including the value of unpaid household activities for the G7 economies. The report concludes with a number of recommendations on the way forward, also touching upon some of the (potential) policy implications of the work on valuing unpaid household activities.
国民核算系统提供关于诸如国内生产总值、家庭可支配收入和最后消费等重要宏观经济指标的资料,通常不包括无酬家庭活动的价值。供自己最终消费的商品生产(如自给农业)、自住住房的服务和雇用有薪家庭工作人员的生产除外,但无薪家庭和个人服务的产出,如准备饭菜、照顾儿童、清洁、修理、志愿服务等均不包括在内。本报告探讨了将无偿家庭活动纳入七国集团宏观经济总量的影响。它建立在Ahmad和Koh(2011)以及van de Ven和Zwijnenburg(2016)的早期工作基础上。报告首先讨论了将无报酬的家庭活动包括在内的利弊,或者更具体地说,这些活动目前被排除在国民核算框架所能得出的宏观经济总量之外的原因。然后讨论了如何使用时间使用调查和其他可用信息的统计数据来编制估算。在这里,也正在处理与无偿家庭活动的大致估价有关的一些复杂问题。随后,在包括七国集团经济体无偿家庭活动的价值时,给出了GDP水平估计以及经济增长的结果。报告最后提出了若干关于前进道路的建议,并触及了评估无偿家庭活动的工作的一些(潜在)政策影响。