A computational method for improving the data acquisition process in the Laser Metal Deposition

Muhammad Mu'az Imran, Gisun Jung, Young Kim, P. E. Abas, L. D. Silva, Y. Kim
{"title":"A computational method for improving the data acquisition process in the Laser Metal Deposition","authors":"Muhammad Mu'az Imran, Gisun Jung, Young Kim, P. E. Abas, L. D. Silva, Y. Kim","doi":"10.1109/CISS56502.2023.10089700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Laser metal deposition (LMD) has developed rapidly in recent years. Although the technology is gaining attention, the data obtained from in-situ sensors are noisy due to the brief processing window and must be analyzed automatically to ensure the reliability of the data acquisition process. Traditionally, researchers used a simple Moving Average (MA) to diminish the peaks of the signals that may inflate the estimation for further data analysis. Spatter is one of the indicators that can describe the process stability of LMD. The generation of spatters is linked to peaks of the signals and has concept drift characteristics. Therefore, this study aims to detect and distinguish between point anomaly and concept drift in data streams in order to remove the extreme values that can mask the actual performance of the deposition process. The proposed method comprises two main components: (1) differencing method to flag the potential point outlier and (2) the density-based method to verify whether the flagged observations are outliers or not. We evaluated and compared our proposed method with the DSPOT method. The results show that our proposed method outperforms the DSPOT method based on the evaluation metrics (Recall, Precision, and F1-score) and the computation time.","PeriodicalId":243775,"journal":{"name":"2023 57th Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems (CISS)","volume":"232 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 57th Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems (CISS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CISS56502.2023.10089700","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Laser metal deposition (LMD) has developed rapidly in recent years. Although the technology is gaining attention, the data obtained from in-situ sensors are noisy due to the brief processing window and must be analyzed automatically to ensure the reliability of the data acquisition process. Traditionally, researchers used a simple Moving Average (MA) to diminish the peaks of the signals that may inflate the estimation for further data analysis. Spatter is one of the indicators that can describe the process stability of LMD. The generation of spatters is linked to peaks of the signals and has concept drift characteristics. Therefore, this study aims to detect and distinguish between point anomaly and concept drift in data streams in order to remove the extreme values that can mask the actual performance of the deposition process. The proposed method comprises two main components: (1) differencing method to flag the potential point outlier and (2) the density-based method to verify whether the flagged observations are outliers or not. We evaluated and compared our proposed method with the DSPOT method. The results show that our proposed method outperforms the DSPOT method based on the evaluation metrics (Recall, Precision, and F1-score) and the computation time.
一种改进激光金属沉积中数据采集过程的计算方法
激光金属沉积技术(LMD)近年来发展迅速。虽然该技术越来越受到关注,但由于处理窗口短,原位传感器获得的数据存在噪声,必须进行自动分析,以保证数据采集过程的可靠性。传统上,研究人员使用简单移动平均线(MA)来减少信号的峰值,这些峰值可能会使进一步的数据分析的估计膨胀。溅射是表征LMD工艺稳定性的指标之一。溅射的产生与信号的峰值有关,并具有概念漂移特性。因此,本研究旨在检测和区分数据流中的点异常和概念漂移,以消除可能掩盖沉积过程实际性能的极值。该方法包括两个主要部分:(1)标记潜在点异常点的差分方法和(2)基于密度的方法来验证标记的观测值是否为异常点。我们评估并比较了我们提出的方法与DSPOT方法。结果表明,基于召回率(Recall)、精确率(Precision)和f1分数(F1-score)的评价指标和计算时间,我们提出的方法优于DSPOT方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信