Competition and investment in on-demand networking technology

Chang Liu, Yuanzhang Xiao, Ermin Wei, R. Berry
{"title":"Competition and investment in on-demand networking technology","authors":"Chang Liu, Yuanzhang Xiao, Ermin Wei, R. Berry","doi":"10.1109/WONS.2017.7888761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Modern on-demand networking technologies (e.g., WiFi-Direct) improve users' networking experiences (e.g., enable them to connect to any WiFi enabled devices). Manufactures of wireless devices may choose to provide these technologies to make their products more appealing and charge a higher price. The perceived benefits from these technologies depend on how many other users are in the network, which we refer to as “positive network effect”. In this paper, we study such a scenario and develop a price-competition based model for the market, where device manufacturers may choose to invest in on-demand technology with positive network effect and consumers choose whether to participate in the market and which manufacturer to buy from. While the positive network effect can give some firms a competitive advantage, leading to a monopolistic market outcome, we show that market equilibrium always exists and the social welfare is larger when the network effect is strong enough. This is because although only the “best” firms have positive market shares at equilibrium, competition from other firms limits the best firms' actions. For a case study of linear demand and network effects, we have analytical characterizations of the equilibrium and show that competition drives firms to invest more on technology and set lower prices at equilibrium, which improves equilibrium social welfare. Numerical studies suggest that these observations may hold in more general settings.","PeriodicalId":110653,"journal":{"name":"2017 13th Annual Conference on Wireless On-demand Network Systems and Services (WONS)","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 13th Annual Conference on Wireless On-demand Network Systems and Services (WONS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WONS.2017.7888761","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Modern on-demand networking technologies (e.g., WiFi-Direct) improve users' networking experiences (e.g., enable them to connect to any WiFi enabled devices). Manufactures of wireless devices may choose to provide these technologies to make their products more appealing and charge a higher price. The perceived benefits from these technologies depend on how many other users are in the network, which we refer to as “positive network effect”. In this paper, we study such a scenario and develop a price-competition based model for the market, where device manufacturers may choose to invest in on-demand technology with positive network effect and consumers choose whether to participate in the market and which manufacturer to buy from. While the positive network effect can give some firms a competitive advantage, leading to a monopolistic market outcome, we show that market equilibrium always exists and the social welfare is larger when the network effect is strong enough. This is because although only the “best” firms have positive market shares at equilibrium, competition from other firms limits the best firms' actions. For a case study of linear demand and network effects, we have analytical characterizations of the equilibrium and show that competition drives firms to invest more on technology and set lower prices at equilibrium, which improves equilibrium social welfare. Numerical studies suggest that these observations may hold in more general settings.
按需网络技术的竞争与投资
现代按需网络技术(例如,WiFi- direct)改善了用户的网络体验(例如,使他们能够连接到任何支持WiFi的设备)。无线设备制造商可能会选择提供这些技术,使他们的产品更有吸引力,并收取更高的价格。这些技术的感知收益取决于网络中有多少其他用户,我们称之为“积极的网络效应”。在本文中,我们研究了这种情况,并建立了一个基于价格竞争的市场模型,其中设备制造商可能选择投资于具有正网络效应的按需技术,消费者可能选择是否参与市场以及从哪个制造商那里购买。虽然积极的网络效应会给一些企业带来竞争优势,从而导致垄断市场的结果,但我们表明,当网络效应足够强时,市场均衡总是存在的,社会福利更大。这是因为尽管只有“最佳”企业在均衡状态下拥有正的市场份额,但来自其他企业的竞争限制了最佳企业的行动。对于线性需求和网络效应的案例研究,我们分析了均衡的特征,并表明竞争促使企业在均衡时增加技术投资并设定更低的价格,从而提高均衡社会福利。数值研究表明,这些观察结果可能适用于更普遍的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信