Use of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Among Intensive Care Unit Patients with Septic Shock

Ahlam Aluneizi, Eman Aluneizi, Dr. Caroline Etland
{"title":"Use of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Among Intensive Care Unit Patients with Septic Shock","authors":"Ahlam Aluneizi, Eman Aluneizi, Dr. Caroline Etland","doi":"10.47672/ejhs.1568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Sepsis is a significant cause of mortality in modern intensive care units (ICUs). At Sharp Grossmont Hospital (SGH), sepsis cases increased the patient mortality rate in comparison to other Sharp facilities. Currently, no tools are utilized to identify septic patients at SGH. The study aimed to find out the impact of early consultation of advanced illness management (AIM) and goals of care conversations (GOCC) on reducing the length of stay (LOS) among septic shock patients. \nMethodology: Descriptive data were attained based on Electronic Medical Records (EMR) of 39 septic shock patients form which ICU nurses utilize to calculate Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) on admission and daily for 2 days.  \nFindings: The education increased the ICU staff’s awareness of the high occurrence of septic shock among ICU patients. After the deployment of SOFA scores among 39 patients of septic shock, the average LOS was 3 days, compared to more than 5 days before implementing SOFA scores. Post-implementation, 33 % of patients received early AIM or GOCC intervention, with 84% of them receiving intervention from the first day of admission. These percentages are compared to pre-implementation, when early AIM or GOCC intervention was provided to 36.4 % of patients, with 41.3 % of them receiving AIM or GOCC from the first day of admission. \nRecommendations: In this study, the leader of change must be aware of standardized Arterial Blood Gas (ABG) orders for SOFA scores and measure the compliance of ICU nurses in documenting SOFA scores. Moreover, raise awareness among healthcare professionals about the high occurrence of septic shock mortality among ICU patients.","PeriodicalId":224837,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Health Sciences","volume":"159 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47672/ejhs.1568","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Sepsis is a significant cause of mortality in modern intensive care units (ICUs). At Sharp Grossmont Hospital (SGH), sepsis cases increased the patient mortality rate in comparison to other Sharp facilities. Currently, no tools are utilized to identify septic patients at SGH. The study aimed to find out the impact of early consultation of advanced illness management (AIM) and goals of care conversations (GOCC) on reducing the length of stay (LOS) among septic shock patients. Methodology: Descriptive data were attained based on Electronic Medical Records (EMR) of 39 septic shock patients form which ICU nurses utilize to calculate Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) on admission and daily for 2 days.  Findings: The education increased the ICU staff’s awareness of the high occurrence of septic shock among ICU patients. After the deployment of SOFA scores among 39 patients of septic shock, the average LOS was 3 days, compared to more than 5 days before implementing SOFA scores. Post-implementation, 33 % of patients received early AIM or GOCC intervention, with 84% of them receiving intervention from the first day of admission. These percentages are compared to pre-implementation, when early AIM or GOCC intervention was provided to 36.4 % of patients, with 41.3 % of them receiving AIM or GOCC from the first day of admission. Recommendations: In this study, the leader of change must be aware of standardized Arterial Blood Gas (ABG) orders for SOFA scores and measure the compliance of ICU nurses in documenting SOFA scores. Moreover, raise awareness among healthcare professionals about the high occurrence of septic shock mortality among ICU patients.
重症监护病房脓毒性休克患者序贯器官衰竭评估的应用
目的:脓毒症是现代重症监护病房(icu)死亡的重要原因。在夏普格罗斯蒙特医院(SGH),败血症病例的患者死亡率比其他夏普设施增加。目前,SGH没有工具用于识别脓毒症患者。本研究旨在探讨晚期疾病管理早期咨询(AIM)和护理对话目标(GOCC)对减少脓毒性休克患者住院时间(LOS)的影响。方法:利用39例感染性休克患者的电子病历(EMR)获得描述性数据,ICU护士在入院时和每天使用EMR计算顺序器官衰竭评估(SOFA),持续2天。结果:教育提高了ICU工作人员对ICU患者感染性休克高发的认识。39例脓毒性休克患者采用SOFA评分后,平均生存时间为3天,而采用SOFA评分前平均生存时间为5天以上。实施后,33%的患者接受了早期AIM或GOCC干预,其中84%的患者从入院第一天开始接受干预。这些百分比与实施前相比,36.4%的患者接受了早期AIM或GOCC干预,其中41.3%的患者从入院第一天起接受了AIM或GOCC。建议:在本研究中,变革的领导者必须了解SOFA评分的标准化动脉血气(ABG)订单,并衡量ICU护士在记录SOFA评分方面的依从性。此外,提高卫生保健专业人员对ICU患者感染性休克死亡率高的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信