Can We Move Beyond the Secular State?

B. Watson
{"title":"Can We Move Beyond the Secular State?","authors":"B. Watson","doi":"10.9734/bpi/sthss/v1/8394d","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article argues for re-consideration of the secularization so often in the West regarded as an essential condition for a democratic state. Its inbuilt incoherence and problematic consequences suggest that the term secular should be abandoned. Deep-seated reasons for objecting to such a proposal follow, discussing an affront to personal integrity, confronting intellectual apartheid and analysing abuse of religion. A way forward is suggested in learning to accept unavoidable levels of uncertainty, so that generous-minded dialogue can take the place of either/or thinking. We need to move forward to an era when democracy is characterized as truly inclusive; when generous-minded dialogue between deeply-felt different convictions enables peaceful co-existence.","PeriodicalId":147148,"journal":{"name":"Selected Topics in Humanities and Social Sciences Vol. 1","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Selected Topics in Humanities and Social Sciences Vol. 1","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/sthss/v1/8394d","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article argues for re-consideration of the secularization so often in the West regarded as an essential condition for a democratic state. Its inbuilt incoherence and problematic consequences suggest that the term secular should be abandoned. Deep-seated reasons for objecting to such a proposal follow, discussing an affront to personal integrity, confronting intellectual apartheid and analysing abuse of religion. A way forward is suggested in learning to accept unavoidable levels of uncertainty, so that generous-minded dialogue can take the place of either/or thinking. We need to move forward to an era when democracy is characterized as truly inclusive; when generous-minded dialogue between deeply-felt different convictions enables peaceful co-existence.
我们能超越世俗国家吗?
这篇文章主张重新考虑世俗化,这种世俗化在西方经常被视为民主国家的必要条件。它固有的不连贯和有问题的后果表明,“世俗”一词应该被抛弃。反对这一提议的深层次原因如下,讨论对个人诚信的侮辱,面对知识隔离和分析滥用宗教。本文提出了一种前进的方法,即学会接受不可避免的不确定性,这样,慷慨的对话就可以取代非此即彼的思考。我们需要走向一个民主主义具有真正包容性的时代;当深深感受到的不同信念之间的慷慨对话使和平共处成为可能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信