{"title":"The Macroeconomic Impact of Social Unrest","authors":"M. Hadzi-Vaskov, Samuel Pienknagura, L. Ricci","doi":"10.5089/9781513582573.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper explores the macroeconomic impact of social unrest, using a novel index based on news reports. It shows that unrest has an adverse effect on economic activity, with GDP remaining on average 0.2 percent below the pre-unrest baseline six quarters after a one-standard deviation increase in the unrest index. Moreover, results are robust to instrumenting via regional unrest to address potential endogeneity concerns. Unrest “events”, captured by a large change in the unrest index, result in a more pronounced decline in GDP—a 1 percent reduction six quarters after the event—but impacts differ by type of event. The adverse impact of unrest on activity is mainly associated with sharp contractions in manufacturing and services, and consumption. However, it can be mitigated by strong institutions and by a country’s policy space (such as fiscal space and exchange rate flexibility).","PeriodicalId":431854,"journal":{"name":"The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5089/9781513582573.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14
Abstract
Abstract This paper explores the macroeconomic impact of social unrest, using a novel index based on news reports. It shows that unrest has an adverse effect on economic activity, with GDP remaining on average 0.2 percent below the pre-unrest baseline six quarters after a one-standard deviation increase in the unrest index. Moreover, results are robust to instrumenting via regional unrest to address potential endogeneity concerns. Unrest “events”, captured by a large change in the unrest index, result in a more pronounced decline in GDP—a 1 percent reduction six quarters after the event—but impacts differ by type of event. The adverse impact of unrest on activity is mainly associated with sharp contractions in manufacturing and services, and consumption. However, it can be mitigated by strong institutions and by a country’s policy space (such as fiscal space and exchange rate flexibility).