A Comparative Study of The Effect of Demineralized Bone Matrix with and Without Low Level Laser Therapy on The Treatment of Periodontal Infra-Bony Defects (Randomized Clinical Trial)

Mostafa S Gamil, M. T. El-Destawy, M. Fekry
{"title":"A Comparative Study of The Effect of Demineralized Bone Matrix with and Without Low Level Laser Therapy on The Treatment of Periodontal Infra-Bony Defects (Randomized Clinical Trial)","authors":"Mostafa S Gamil, M. T. El-Destawy, M. Fekry","doi":"10.21608/aadj.2019.60188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This study aimed at comparing clinically and radiographically the therapeutic effect of low level laser therapy and demineralized bone matrix, used in management of periodontal intrabony defect. Subjects and methods: Thirty two non-smoking patients aged between 28-51 years with severe chronic periodontitis participated in this randomized clinical study. Patients were randomly assigned into one of 2 groups (16 patients each): demineralized bone grafting alone of the intrabony defect, control group (Group I), demineralized bone grafting and the application of low level laser therapy (LLLT) (Group II). Clinical and radiographic parameters including plaque index, bleeding index, probing depth, clinical attachment level (CAL) and intrabony defect depth were reassessed at 6 months after surgery. Results:  Specifically, LLLT treated sites (Group II) showed statistically significant differences regarding pocket depth and CAL compared with Group I. Intrabony defect depth was significantly reduced for LLLT group compared to that of Group I control. Conclusion: The use of LLLT as an adjunct with demineralized bone matrix (DBM) in the treatment of intrabony defects was more significant in improving the probing depth, CAL and intrabony defect depth than using DBM alone.","PeriodicalId":136230,"journal":{"name":"Al-Azhar Assiut Dental Journal","volume":"517 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Azhar Assiut Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/aadj.2019.60188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed at comparing clinically and radiographically the therapeutic effect of low level laser therapy and demineralized bone matrix, used in management of periodontal intrabony defect. Subjects and methods: Thirty two non-smoking patients aged between 28-51 years with severe chronic periodontitis participated in this randomized clinical study. Patients were randomly assigned into one of 2 groups (16 patients each): demineralized bone grafting alone of the intrabony defect, control group (Group I), demineralized bone grafting and the application of low level laser therapy (LLLT) (Group II). Clinical and radiographic parameters including plaque index, bleeding index, probing depth, clinical attachment level (CAL) and intrabony defect depth were reassessed at 6 months after surgery. Results:  Specifically, LLLT treated sites (Group II) showed statistically significant differences regarding pocket depth and CAL compared with Group I. Intrabony defect depth was significantly reduced for LLLT group compared to that of Group I control. Conclusion: The use of LLLT as an adjunct with demineralized bone matrix (DBM) in the treatment of intrabony defects was more significant in improving the probing depth, CAL and intrabony defect depth than using DBM alone.
低水平激光治疗与非低水平激光治疗牙周骨下缺损效果比较(随机临床试验)
目的:比较低水平激光治疗与脱矿骨基质治疗牙周骨内缺损的临床及影像学疗效。研究对象和方法:32例年龄在28-51岁的非吸烟重度慢性牙周炎患者参加了随机临床研究。患者随机分为2组(每组16例):骨内缺损单纯脱矿骨移植组、对照组(I组)、脱矿骨移植联合低水平激光治疗组(II组)。术后6个月重新评估斑块指数、出血指数、探探深度、临床附着水平(CAL)、骨内缺损深度等临床和影像学参数。结果:具体而言,LLLT治疗部位(II组)的口袋深度和CAL与I组相比有统计学差异。与I组相比,LLLT组的骨内缺陷深度显著降低。结论:与单纯应用脱矿骨基质(DBM)治疗骨内缺损相比,应用LLLT辅助脱矿骨基质(DBM)治疗骨内缺损在改善探探深度、CAL和骨内缺损深度方面更为显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信