Reduction in liquid hydrogen by weight due to storage in different sizes of containers for varying period of time

M. Gautam, K. S. Rao, B. Saxena
{"title":"Reduction in liquid hydrogen by weight due to storage in different sizes of containers for varying period of time","authors":"M. Gautam, K. S. Rao, B. Saxena","doi":"10.1109/TAPENERGY.2017.8397347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To reduce the CO2 emissions, many countries have adopted renewable energy mix in their energy production. However, energy produced from renewable energy sources is intermittent in nature. The surplus energy generated from intermittent renewable energy sources is utilized for electrolysis of water to produce hydrogen. Then hydrogen is stored in the form of liquid or compressed gas for later utilization. H2 can be produced, stored, and utilized to generate electricity and water using fuel cell technology at a later time when demand arises. For this reason, an analysis of storage period in a storage medium is required. In this paper, five commercial electrolyzers are selected for hydrogen production. Amount of hydrogen produced from electrolysis of water, electrolyzer efficiencies, and H2 transmission losses for 500 km are estimated. Liquid hydrogen storage method is explained in this paper. Cost of liquefaction and cost of hydrogen storage at onsite and at hydrogen transport distance of 500 km are calculated. This paper attempts to analyze the loss pattern of stored liquid H2 with varying time in storage tanks of different sizes. By considering per day losses of 0.4%, 0.2%, and 0.06% for 50 m3, 100 m3, and 20,000 m3 storage tanks respectively, amount of residual hydrogen after six months, one year, and two years at onsite and at 500 km H2 transportation distance in 50 m3, 100 m3, and 20,000 m3 storage tanks are also estimated using MATLAB calculations. It can be seen from the results that for 20,000 m3 tank, the percentage of initial amount of H2 remaining after six months, one year, and two years are 99.94%, 80.33%, and 33.44% respectively. The corresponding values for small size containers reduce with reduction in size.","PeriodicalId":237016,"journal":{"name":"2017 International Conference on Technological Advancements in Power and Energy ( TAP Energy)","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 International Conference on Technological Advancements in Power and Energy ( TAP Energy)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TAPENERGY.2017.8397347","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

To reduce the CO2 emissions, many countries have adopted renewable energy mix in their energy production. However, energy produced from renewable energy sources is intermittent in nature. The surplus energy generated from intermittent renewable energy sources is utilized for electrolysis of water to produce hydrogen. Then hydrogen is stored in the form of liquid or compressed gas for later utilization. H2 can be produced, stored, and utilized to generate electricity and water using fuel cell technology at a later time when demand arises. For this reason, an analysis of storage period in a storage medium is required. In this paper, five commercial electrolyzers are selected for hydrogen production. Amount of hydrogen produced from electrolysis of water, electrolyzer efficiencies, and H2 transmission losses for 500 km are estimated. Liquid hydrogen storage method is explained in this paper. Cost of liquefaction and cost of hydrogen storage at onsite and at hydrogen transport distance of 500 km are calculated. This paper attempts to analyze the loss pattern of stored liquid H2 with varying time in storage tanks of different sizes. By considering per day losses of 0.4%, 0.2%, and 0.06% for 50 m3, 100 m3, and 20,000 m3 storage tanks respectively, amount of residual hydrogen after six months, one year, and two years at onsite and at 500 km H2 transportation distance in 50 m3, 100 m3, and 20,000 m3 storage tanks are also estimated using MATLAB calculations. It can be seen from the results that for 20,000 m3 tank, the percentage of initial amount of H2 remaining after six months, one year, and two years are 99.94%, 80.33%, and 33.44% respectively. The corresponding values for small size containers reduce with reduction in size.
由于在不同尺寸的容器中储存不同的时间,液氢的重量减少
为了减少二氧化碳的排放,许多国家在能源生产中采用了可再生能源结构。然而,可再生能源产生的能源本质上是间歇性的。间歇性可再生能源产生的剩余能量用于电解水以产生氢气。然后氢气以液体或压缩气体的形式储存起来供以后使用。氢气可以生产、储存,并在以后需求出现时使用燃料电池技术发电和用水。因此,需要对存储介质的存储周期进行分析。本文选择了5台工业电解槽进行制氢。估计了电解水产生的氢气量、电解槽效率和500公里氢气传输损失。本文阐述了液氢的储存方法。计算了液化成本、现场储氢成本和500公里输氢成本。本文试图分析不同尺寸储罐中储液H2随时间变化的损失规律。考虑50 m3、100 m3、20000 m3储罐的日损耗量分别为0.4%、0.2%、0.06%,并利用MATLAB计算得出50 m3、100 m3、20000 m3储罐在现场6个月、1年、2年以及500km氢气输送距离下的剩余氢气量。由结果可以看出,对于2万m3储罐,6个月、1年、2年后H2初始残留量的比例分别为99.94%、80.33%、33.44%。小尺寸容器的相应值随着尺寸的减小而减小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信