Taking the sting out of assessment: The experiences of trainee teachers experimenting with innovative alternative performance assessment in the History classroom

Pieter Warnich, H. Lubbe
{"title":"Taking the sting out of assessment: The experiences of trainee teachers experimenting with innovative alternative performance assessment in the History classroom","authors":"Pieter Warnich, H. Lubbe","doi":"10.17159/2223-0386/2019/n22a5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores the experiences of History and Social Sciences (History) trainee teachers (n=33) and their learners during the implementation of five versatile and innovative alternative performance assessment strategies in their diverse classroom settings during their practicum at schools. Originally designed for the corporate staff training environment, and subsequently utilised as community building and data collection techniques in a participative community-engaged research project, these five interactive activities were adapted to act as innovative teaching and alternative formative performance assessment strategies in the History classroom, the latter of which is the main focus of this article. The article is anchored in a social constructivist and dialogic theoretical framework and argues that alternative performance assessment techniques that are non-graded, interactive, formative and dialogic in nature, take place within an atmosphere of emotional safety, and integrate a strong element of enjoyment, are able to remove the anxiety that often characterises both summative and graded formative assessment. This, in turn, makes learners more receptive to learning and brings History to life in the classroom. In an attempt to answer two interrelated research questions: “how did trainee History teachers experience the implementation of innovative alternative performance assessment strategies”, and “how did they perceive the response of the learners to a fresh approach to formative assessment”, the article employs a qualitative research methodology which rests on research findings generated through the use of data gathered from written, visual and oral feedback from the participants during and after a practical workshop which prepared them for the implementation phase of the study. The research findings suggest, inter alia, that both the trainee teachers and their learners enjoyed a fresh, non-threatening approach to formative assessment and that the learners participated freely and enthusiastically in groups when implementing these formative assessment strategies. ... trainee teachers experimenting with innovative alternative performance assessment ... History classroom, pp. 88-118","PeriodicalId":190311,"journal":{"name":"Yesterday and Today","volume":"206 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yesterday and Today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17159/2223-0386/2019/n22a5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article explores the experiences of History and Social Sciences (History) trainee teachers (n=33) and their learners during the implementation of five versatile and innovative alternative performance assessment strategies in their diverse classroom settings during their practicum at schools. Originally designed for the corporate staff training environment, and subsequently utilised as community building and data collection techniques in a participative community-engaged research project, these five interactive activities were adapted to act as innovative teaching and alternative formative performance assessment strategies in the History classroom, the latter of which is the main focus of this article. The article is anchored in a social constructivist and dialogic theoretical framework and argues that alternative performance assessment techniques that are non-graded, interactive, formative and dialogic in nature, take place within an atmosphere of emotional safety, and integrate a strong element of enjoyment, are able to remove the anxiety that often characterises both summative and graded formative assessment. This, in turn, makes learners more receptive to learning and brings History to life in the classroom. In an attempt to answer two interrelated research questions: “how did trainee History teachers experience the implementation of innovative alternative performance assessment strategies”, and “how did they perceive the response of the learners to a fresh approach to formative assessment”, the article employs a qualitative research methodology which rests on research findings generated through the use of data gathered from written, visual and oral feedback from the participants during and after a practical workshop which prepared them for the implementation phase of the study. The research findings suggest, inter alia, that both the trainee teachers and their learners enjoyed a fresh, non-threatening approach to formative assessment and that the learners participated freely and enthusiastically in groups when implementing these formative assessment strategies. ... trainee teachers experimenting with innovative alternative performance assessment ... History classroom, pp. 88-118
消除评估的刺痛:实习教师在历史课堂上试验创新替代绩效评估的经验
本文探讨了历史和社会科学(历史)实习教师(n=33)及其学习者在学校实习期间在不同的课堂环境中实施五种多功能和创新的替代绩效评估策略的经验。最初是为公司员工培训环境设计的,随后在一个参与式社区参与研究项目中用作社区建设和数据收集技术,这五个互动活动被改编为历史课堂上的创新教学和另类形成性绩效评估策略,后者是本文的主要重点。本文以社会建构主义和对话理论框架为基础,认为非分级、互动性、形成性和对话性的另类绩效评估技术,在情感安全的氛围中进行,并融入了强烈的享受元素,能够消除总结性和分级形成性评估的焦虑。这反过来又使学习者更容易接受学习,并使历史在课堂上栩栩如生。为了回答两个相互关联的研究问题:“实习历史教师如何体验创新的另类绩效评估策略的实施”,以及“他们如何看待学习者对形成性评估的新方法的反应”,文章采用了定性研究方法,该方法依赖于通过使用从书面,参与者在实践研讨会期间和之后的视觉和口头反馈,为研究的实施阶段做好准备。研究结果表明,除其他外,实习教师和他们的学习者都喜欢一种新鲜的,无威胁性的形成性评估方法,学习者在实施这些形成性评估策略时自由而热情地参与小组活动. ...实习教师正在试验创新的另类绩效评估方法……历史教室,第88-118页
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信