The Fourth Industrial Revolution, Development and Intellectual Property - the World Economic and Social Survey 2018 and Beyond

Hoi Wai Jackie Cheng, M. Parra
{"title":"The Fourth Industrial Revolution, Development and Intellectual Property - the World Economic and Social Survey 2018 and Beyond","authors":"Hoi Wai Jackie Cheng, M. Parra","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3687110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The chapter calls for a rethinking of the trade-off between innovation and diffusion, with the focus on revisiting the current intellectual property (IP) institutions against the backdrop of the Fourth Industrial Revolution and sustainable development.<br><br>The contention is underpinned by two observations. First, a review of empirical evidence has generally failed to find much effect of IP institutions, notably patents, on innovation – the raison d’être of IP. While the incentivizing effect of IP on any given innovator’s R&amp;D activities is indisputable, its effect on system-wide innovation could be counteracted by several factors. These include the adverse effects of IP institutions on innovation diffusion, follow-up innovations and competition, which could be partly attributed to the lack of clear boundaries of IP and the absence of efficient and liquid IP markets. As will be discussed in this chapter, these effects will likely become more salient in the Fourth Industrial Revolution.<br><br>Secondly, the increasingly restrictive global intellectual property rights (IPR) regime poses significant challenges to countries, especially developing ones, in accessing frontier technologies and fully participating in the Fourth Industrial Revolution, which would in all likelihood lead to greater technology and development gaps. It may also lead to failures in addressing global problems such as climate change due to the under-utilization of technologies that could provide effective solutions if appropriately diffused.<br><br>This chapter concludes with a discussion on some of the options to revamp the market-based IP institutions that are directed at exclusivity and ownership, as well as alternative incentive mechanisms that seek to enable a wider diffusion of technologies without hampering innovation efforts.","PeriodicalId":219965,"journal":{"name":"InfoSciRN: Other Copyright & Intellectual Property (Sub-Topic)","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"InfoSciRN: Other Copyright & Intellectual Property (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3687110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The chapter calls for a rethinking of the trade-off between innovation and diffusion, with the focus on revisiting the current intellectual property (IP) institutions against the backdrop of the Fourth Industrial Revolution and sustainable development.

The contention is underpinned by two observations. First, a review of empirical evidence has generally failed to find much effect of IP institutions, notably patents, on innovation – the raison d’être of IP. While the incentivizing effect of IP on any given innovator’s R&D activities is indisputable, its effect on system-wide innovation could be counteracted by several factors. These include the adverse effects of IP institutions on innovation diffusion, follow-up innovations and competition, which could be partly attributed to the lack of clear boundaries of IP and the absence of efficient and liquid IP markets. As will be discussed in this chapter, these effects will likely become more salient in the Fourth Industrial Revolution.

Secondly, the increasingly restrictive global intellectual property rights (IPR) regime poses significant challenges to countries, especially developing ones, in accessing frontier technologies and fully participating in the Fourth Industrial Revolution, which would in all likelihood lead to greater technology and development gaps. It may also lead to failures in addressing global problems such as climate change due to the under-utilization of technologies that could provide effective solutions if appropriately diffused.

This chapter concludes with a discussion on some of the options to revamp the market-based IP institutions that are directed at exclusivity and ownership, as well as alternative incentive mechanisms that seek to enable a wider diffusion of technologies without hampering innovation efforts.
第四次工业革命、发展与知识产权——《2018年及以后世界经济与社会概览》
本章呼吁重新思考创新与传播之间的权衡,重点是在第四次工业革命和可持续发展的背景下重新审视当前的知识产权制度。这一论点得到了两个观察结果的支持。首先,对经验证据的回顾通常未能发现知识产权制度(尤其是专利)对创新的很大影响——这是知识产权的être的原因。虽然知识产权对任何特定创新者的研发活动的激励作用是无可争辩的,但它对全系统创新的影响可能被几个因素抵消。其中包括知识产权制度对创新扩散、后续创新和竞争的不利影响,其部分原因可能是知识产权缺乏明确的界限,以及缺乏有效和流动的知识产权市场。正如本章将讨论的那样,这些影响可能会在第四次工业革命中变得更加突出。其次,日益严格的全球知识产权制度给各国,特别是发展中国家获取前沿技术和全面参与第四次工业革命带来重大挑战,这很可能导致更大的技术和发展差距。它还可能导致解决气候变化等全球性问题的失败,因为这些技术如果得到适当的推广,可以提供有效的解决办法,但利用不足。本章最后讨论了改革以市场为基础的知识产权制度的一些选择,这些制度以排他性和所有权为导向,以及寻求在不阻碍创新努力的情况下更广泛地传播技术的其他激励机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信