Radical Cystectomy Versus Bladder-Preserving Therapy in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Patients After Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis

Y. Jo, Jun Seok Kim, Yoo Sub Shin, Jongchan Kim, W. S. Jang, J. Park, W. Ham
{"title":"Radical Cystectomy Versus Bladder-Preserving Therapy in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Patients After Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis","authors":"Y. Jo, Jun Seok Kim, Yoo Sub Shin, Jongchan Kim, W. S. Jang, J. Park, W. Ham","doi":"10.22465/juo.234600280014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Although radical cystectomy (RC) and concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) are curative options for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), the optimal treatment strategy for MIBC patients with a history of nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) remains unclear. This retrospective analysis was conducted to compare survival rates and evaluate prognostic factors related to treatment outcomes.Materials and Methods: We conducted a multi-institutional retrospective study of patients with MIBC after nephroureterectomy for UTUC between 2005 to 2023. Out of 75 patients, 30 underwent bladder-preserving therapy (BPT), including 22 patients who underwent radiation therapy (RT) and 8 patients who underwent CCRT, while 45 patients underwent RC. The overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and progression-free survival (PFS) after BPT and RC were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier curves. Cox regression analysis was used to identify variables associated with OS, CSS, and PFS. Posttreatment changes in renal function were compared.Results: At 3 years, the OS, CSS, and PFS rates in the BPT group were 52.4%, 71.7%, and 31.3%, respectively, with no significant difference compared to RC. In multivariate analysis, bladder cancer T stage was the only predictive factor for OS, CSS, and PFS. Similar results were also observed in the RT group compared to RC. A significant decrease in renal function was detected among patients in the RC group, while patients in the BPT group maintained preserved renal function. Patients in the BPT group experienced a lower grade of toxicity after treatment compared to those in the RC group, and the rates of survival with functional bladder at 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years were 87.0%, 69.9%, and 69.9%, respectively.Conclusions: Bladder-preserving therapy, including RT alone, may be a viable treatment option for patients with MIBC who have undergone nephroureterectomy, as it can achieve comparable oncologic outcomes to RC, while potentially preserving bladder and renal function.","PeriodicalId":125788,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urologic Oncology","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Urologic Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22465/juo.234600280014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: Although radical cystectomy (RC) and concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) are curative options for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), the optimal treatment strategy for MIBC patients with a history of nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) remains unclear. This retrospective analysis was conducted to compare survival rates and evaluate prognostic factors related to treatment outcomes.Materials and Methods: We conducted a multi-institutional retrospective study of patients with MIBC after nephroureterectomy for UTUC between 2005 to 2023. Out of 75 patients, 30 underwent bladder-preserving therapy (BPT), including 22 patients who underwent radiation therapy (RT) and 8 patients who underwent CCRT, while 45 patients underwent RC. The overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and progression-free survival (PFS) after BPT and RC were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier curves. Cox regression analysis was used to identify variables associated with OS, CSS, and PFS. Posttreatment changes in renal function were compared.Results: At 3 years, the OS, CSS, and PFS rates in the BPT group were 52.4%, 71.7%, and 31.3%, respectively, with no significant difference compared to RC. In multivariate analysis, bladder cancer T stage was the only predictive factor for OS, CSS, and PFS. Similar results were also observed in the RT group compared to RC. A significant decrease in renal function was detected among patients in the RC group, while patients in the BPT group maintained preserved renal function. Patients in the BPT group experienced a lower grade of toxicity after treatment compared to those in the RC group, and the rates of survival with functional bladder at 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years were 87.0%, 69.9%, and 69.9%, respectively.Conclusions: Bladder-preserving therapy, including RT alone, may be a viable treatment option for patients with MIBC who have undergone nephroureterectomy, as it can achieve comparable oncologic outcomes to RC, while potentially preserving bladder and renal function.
上尿路癌肾输尿管切除术后肌肉浸润性膀胱癌患者根治性膀胱切除术与膀胱保留治疗:一项多中心回顾性分析
目的:虽然根治性膀胱切除术(RC)和同步放化疗(CCRT)是肌肉浸润性膀胱癌(MIBC)的治疗选择,但对于有肾输尿管切除术史的上尿路上皮癌(UTUC)的MIBC患者的最佳治疗策略尚不清楚。这项回顾性分析是为了比较生存率和评估与治疗结果相关的预后因素。材料和方法:我们对2005年至2023年间因UTUC而行肾输尿管切除术后的MIBC患者进行了多机构回顾性研究。在75名患者中,30名患者接受了保膀胱治疗(BPT),其中22名患者接受了放射治疗(RT), 8名患者接受了CCRT,而45名患者接受了RC。采用Kaplan-Meier曲线评估BPT和RC后的总生存期(OS)、肿瘤特异性生存期(CSS)和无进展生存期(PFS)。采用Cox回归分析确定与OS、CSS和PFS相关的变量。比较治疗后肾功能的变化。结果:3年时,BPT组的OS、CSS和PFS分别为52.4%、71.7%和31.3%,与RC组比较差异无统计学意义。在多变量分析中,膀胱癌T期是OS、CSS和PFS的唯一预测因素。与RC相比,RT组也观察到类似的结果。RC组患者肾功能明显下降,而BPT组患者肾功能保持正常。与RC组相比,BPT组患者在治疗后的毒性程度较低,1年、3年和5年膀胱功能生存率分别为87.0%、69.9%和69.9%。结论:膀胱保留疗法,包括单独RT,可能是接受肾输尿管切除术的MIBC患者的可行治疗选择,因为它可以达到与RC相当的肿瘤结果,同时可能保留膀胱和肾脏功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信