Insights into postgraduate student behaviour, underpinned by motivational orientation, within an emergency remote teaching environment

Nicola Rivers, K. Beilby
{"title":"Insights into postgraduate student behaviour, underpinned by motivational orientation, within an emergency remote teaching environment","authors":"Nicola Rivers, K. Beilby","doi":"10.59197/asrhe.v4i1.7711","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Much of the world switched to emergency remote teaching (ERT) as the Covid-19 pandemic unfolded and deciding which learnings to integrate into the return to normative practice, if any at all, is worthy of investigation. Opportunistic observation and inquiry into student behaviour in response to ERT can provide depth to our current understanding of pedagogical practice and theory. Here, we consider our students’ perception of workload, which dropped consistently between 2019-2022, alongside our students experiences and their self-regulation styles as defined by self-determination theory (SDT). Using SDT to consider how different self-regulation styles interacted with factors internal and external to the course allowed us to reflect on the impact of changes made to the teaching environment, and effects of the global pandemic. We found students preference asynchronous engagement with content that was designed to be synchronous, but issues with time management and pressure to work contributed to an imbalance that resulted in an increased perception of workload. Interestingly, how students reacted to and adapted to this imbalance differed depending on their self-regulation style. Understanding the changing needs of students is imperative to designing education effectively in our changing social climate. Evaluating course design to ensure delivery methods offer value to students and communicating the purpose of these design decisions is critical in an environment where education is competing with paid work. Ensuring students and teachers are aligned through the education process will be key to navigating the changing external pressures students are facing, helping to improve the student experience overall.","PeriodicalId":158792,"journal":{"name":"Advancing Scholarship and Research in Higher Education","volume":"979 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advancing Scholarship and Research in Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59197/asrhe.v4i1.7711","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Much of the world switched to emergency remote teaching (ERT) as the Covid-19 pandemic unfolded and deciding which learnings to integrate into the return to normative practice, if any at all, is worthy of investigation. Opportunistic observation and inquiry into student behaviour in response to ERT can provide depth to our current understanding of pedagogical practice and theory. Here, we consider our students’ perception of workload, which dropped consistently between 2019-2022, alongside our students experiences and their self-regulation styles as defined by self-determination theory (SDT). Using SDT to consider how different self-regulation styles interacted with factors internal and external to the course allowed us to reflect on the impact of changes made to the teaching environment, and effects of the global pandemic. We found students preference asynchronous engagement with content that was designed to be synchronous, but issues with time management and pressure to work contributed to an imbalance that resulted in an increased perception of workload. Interestingly, how students reacted to and adapted to this imbalance differed depending on their self-regulation style. Understanding the changing needs of students is imperative to designing education effectively in our changing social climate. Evaluating course design to ensure delivery methods offer value to students and communicating the purpose of these design decisions is critical in an environment where education is competing with paid work. Ensuring students and teachers are aligned through the education process will be key to navigating the changing external pressures students are facing, helping to improve the student experience overall.
在紧急远程教学环境中,以动机导向为基础,深入了解研究生行为
随着Covid-19大流行的爆发,世界上大部分地区都转向了紧急远程教学(ERT),如果有的话,决定将哪些经验教训融入到回归规范实践中是值得研究的。机会性观察和探究学生对ERT的反应行为可以加深我们目前对教学实践和理论的理解。在这里,我们考虑了学生对工作量的感知,在2019年至2022年期间持续下降,以及我们的学生经历和自我决定理论(SDT)定义的自我调节风格。使用SDT来考虑不同的自我调节方式如何与课程内部和外部因素相互作用,使我们能够反思教学环境变化的影响,以及全球大流行的影响。我们发现学生们更喜欢异步参与到同步的内容中,但是时间管理和工作压力的问题导致了不平衡,导致了工作量的增加。有趣的是,学生对这种不平衡的反应和适应方式取决于他们的自我调节方式。了解学生不断变化的需求对于在不断变化的社会环境中有效地设计教育是必不可少的。在教育与有偿工作竞争的环境中,评估课程设计以确保交付方法为学生提供价值,并传达这些设计决策的目的至关重要。确保学生和教师在教育过程中保持一致,将是应对学生面临的不断变化的外部压力的关键,有助于改善学生的整体体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信