Weekend Feeding ('Backpack') Programs and Student Outcomes

Food Laws Pub Date : 2020-01-30 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.3528563
Michael Kurtz, K. Conway, Robert D. Mohr
{"title":"Weekend Feeding ('Backpack') Programs and Student Outcomes","authors":"Michael Kurtz, K. Conway, Robert D. Mohr","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3528563","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Weekend feeding (“BackPack�?) programs that provide food to children have grown dramatically in recent years, yet their effects on educational outcomes have been little investigated. Our study combines administrative student data on test scores and absences in Northwest North Carolina elementary schools with primary data on program participation. School and student program eligibility criteria is used to estimate the intent-to-treat effect within a difference-in-difference-in-difference (DDD) framework. Results suggest a sizable 0.09 standard deviation improvement in reading scores, with similar but weaker effects for math scores. These effects are strongest for the youngest and lowest performing students.","PeriodicalId":365834,"journal":{"name":"Food Laws","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Laws","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3528563","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Weekend feeding (“BackPack�?) programs that provide food to children have grown dramatically in recent years, yet their effects on educational outcomes have been little investigated. Our study combines administrative student data on test scores and absences in Northwest North Carolina elementary schools with primary data on program participation. School and student program eligibility criteria is used to estimate the intent-to-treat effect within a difference-in-difference-in-difference (DDD) framework. Results suggest a sizable 0.09 standard deviation improvement in reading scores, with similar but weaker effects for math scores. These effects are strongest for the youngest and lowest performing students.
周末喂养(“双肩包”)项目和学生成绩
近年来,为孩子们提供食物的周末喂养(“双肩背包”)项目大幅增加,但它们对教育成果的影响却很少得到调查。我们的研究将北卡罗莱纳西北部小学的学生考试成绩和缺勤数据与项目参与的主要数据相结合。学校和学生项目资格标准用于在差异中差异(DDD)框架内评估意向治疗效果。结果表明,阅读成绩有0.09个标准差的显著提高,数学成绩也有类似的效果,但效果较弱。这些影响在最年轻和表现最差的学生身上表现得最为明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信