Administration without Sovereignty

A. Somek
{"title":"Administration without Sovereignty","authors":"A. Somek","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199585007.003.0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article offers both a sympathetic and a skeptical perspective on the global administrative law project. While the author agrees with the project's major premise that processes of global governance are to be described in administrative terms he also expresses doubts as to whether these processes are susceptible to the discipline of legality. The article speculates if what has been described hitherto as a move beyond the state might not be better understood, in fact, as the unfettering of statal administrative rationality from legal bounds. In particular, facile attempts to submit administrative processes to some discursively fluid form of legal constraint are likely to fall prey to what the law is supposed to control and thus to obscure social reality owing to the influence of normative idealisations.","PeriodicalId":340197,"journal":{"name":"Comparative & Global Administrative Law eJournal","volume":"55 6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative & Global Administrative Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199585007.003.0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The article offers both a sympathetic and a skeptical perspective on the global administrative law project. While the author agrees with the project's major premise that processes of global governance are to be described in administrative terms he also expresses doubts as to whether these processes are susceptible to the discipline of legality. The article speculates if what has been described hitherto as a move beyond the state might not be better understood, in fact, as the unfettering of statal administrative rationality from legal bounds. In particular, facile attempts to submit administrative processes to some discursively fluid form of legal constraint are likely to fall prey to what the law is supposed to control and thus to obscure social reality owing to the influence of normative idealisations.
没有主权的行政
这篇文章对全球行政法项目提出了既同情又怀疑的观点。虽然作者同意该项目的主要前提,即全球治理过程应以行政术语来描述,但他也对这些过程是否受合法性纪律的影响表示怀疑。这篇文章推测,迄今为止被描述为超越国家的举动,实际上可能不能更好地理解为将国家行政理性从法律界限中解放出来。特别是,轻率地试图将行政程序置于某种话语流动形式的法律约束之下,很可能成为法律应该控制的对象的牺牲品,从而由于规范性理想化的影响而模糊社会现实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信