Defeating the Credit Card Scams Through Machine Learning Algorithms

Kameron Bains, Adebamigbe Fasanmade, J. Morden, A. Al-Bayatti, M. S. Sharif, A. S. Alfakeeh
{"title":"Defeating the Credit Card Scams Through Machine Learning Algorithms","authors":"Kameron Bains, Adebamigbe Fasanmade, J. Morden, A. Al-Bayatti, M. S. Sharif, A. S. Alfakeeh","doi":"10.1109/3ICT53449.2021.9582060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Credit card fraud is a significant problem that is not going to go away. It is a growing problem and surged during the Covid-19 pandemic since more transactions are done without cash in hand now. Credit card frauds are complicated to distinguish as the characteristics of legitimate and fraudulent transactions are very similar. The performance evaluation of various Machine Learning (ML)-based credit card fraud recognition schemes are significantly pretentious due to data processing, including collecting variables and corresponding ML mechanism being used. One possible way to counter this problem is to apply ML algorithms such as Support Vector Machine (SVM), K nearest neighbor (KNN), Naive Bayes, and logistic regression. This research work aims to compare the ML as mentioned earlier models and its impact on credit card scam detection, especially in situations with imbalanced datasets. Moreover, we have proposed state of the art data balancing algorithm to solve data unbalancing problems in such situations. Our experiments show that the logistic regression has an accuracy of 99.91%, and naive bays have an accuracy of 97.65%. K nearest neighbor has an accuracy is 99.92%, support vector machine has an accuracy of 99.95%. The precision and accuracy comparison of our proposed approach shows that our model is state of the art.","PeriodicalId":133021,"journal":{"name":"2021 International Conference on Innovation and Intelligence for Informatics, Computing, and Technologies (3ICT)","volume":"231 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 International Conference on Innovation and Intelligence for Informatics, Computing, and Technologies (3ICT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/3ICT53449.2021.9582060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Credit card fraud is a significant problem that is not going to go away. It is a growing problem and surged during the Covid-19 pandemic since more transactions are done without cash in hand now. Credit card frauds are complicated to distinguish as the characteristics of legitimate and fraudulent transactions are very similar. The performance evaluation of various Machine Learning (ML)-based credit card fraud recognition schemes are significantly pretentious due to data processing, including collecting variables and corresponding ML mechanism being used. One possible way to counter this problem is to apply ML algorithms such as Support Vector Machine (SVM), K nearest neighbor (KNN), Naive Bayes, and logistic regression. This research work aims to compare the ML as mentioned earlier models and its impact on credit card scam detection, especially in situations with imbalanced datasets. Moreover, we have proposed state of the art data balancing algorithm to solve data unbalancing problems in such situations. Our experiments show that the logistic regression has an accuracy of 99.91%, and naive bays have an accuracy of 97.65%. K nearest neighbor has an accuracy is 99.92%, support vector machine has an accuracy of 99.95%. The precision and accuracy comparison of our proposed approach shows that our model is state of the art.
通过机器学习算法击败信用卡诈骗
信用卡欺诈是一个不会消失的重大问题。这是一个日益严重的问题,在Covid-19大流行期间激增,因为现在更多的交易是在没有现金的情况下完成的。由于合法交易和欺诈交易的特征非常相似,信用卡诈骗很难区分。各种基于机器学习(ML)的信用卡欺诈识别方案的性能评估由于数据处理而显着矫情,包括收集变量和使用相应的ML机制。解决这个问题的一个可能方法是应用ML算法,如支持向量机(SVM)、K近邻(KNN)、朴素贝叶斯和逻辑回归。这项研究工作旨在比较前面提到的模型及其对信用卡诈骗检测的影响,特别是在数据集不平衡的情况下。此外,我们提出了最先进的数据平衡算法来解决这种情况下的数据不平衡问题。我们的实验表明,逻辑回归的准确率为99.91%,朴素bays的准确率为97.65%。K最近邻的准确率为99.92%,支持向量机的准确率为99.95%。我们提出的方法的精度和准确度的比较表明,我们的模型是最先进的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信