‘Non erubescat Hollandia’: Classical Embarrassment of Riches and the Construction of Local History in Hadrianus Junius’ Batavia

C. Maas
{"title":"‘Non erubescat Hollandia’: Classical Embarrassment of Riches and the Construction of Local History in Hadrianus Junius’ Batavia","authors":"C. Maas","doi":"10.1163/9789004378216_015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At least since 1987, when Simon Schama published his famous study The Embarrassment of Riches: An Interpretation of Dutch Culture in the Golden Age, it has been well known that there was a strong connection between notions of wealth and collective identity in the early modern Low Countries, or at least in Holland.1 In this book, the incomparable wealth and the boundless consumerism in the young Dutch Republic are contrasted with the dominant moralist discourse of the seventeenth century – a discourse that was often hostile to avarice, luxury, and wasting money. According to Schama, this paradoxical phenomenon is at odds with Max Weber’s famous thesis that Calvinism denounced consumerism, praised a strong work ethic, and regarded wealth as a confirmation of God’s benevolence, that in doing so it created favourable conditions for investment as an alternative to consumption, and that it thus contributed to the rise of capitalism.2 Schama argued that this theory does not explain the situation in the seventeenth-century Dutch Republic very well, because despite the dominance of Calvinism, the Dutch Republic witnessed a strong consumerist culture. Moreover, Calvinism was far from unique in its critique of wealth. Most importantly, however, Calvinists often criticized","PeriodicalId":104280,"journal":{"name":"The Quest for an Appropriate Past in Literature, Art and Architecture","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Quest for an Appropriate Past in Literature, Art and Architecture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004378216_015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

At least since 1987, when Simon Schama published his famous study The Embarrassment of Riches: An Interpretation of Dutch Culture in the Golden Age, it has been well known that there was a strong connection between notions of wealth and collective identity in the early modern Low Countries, or at least in Holland.1 In this book, the incomparable wealth and the boundless consumerism in the young Dutch Republic are contrasted with the dominant moralist discourse of the seventeenth century – a discourse that was often hostile to avarice, luxury, and wasting money. According to Schama, this paradoxical phenomenon is at odds with Max Weber’s famous thesis that Calvinism denounced consumerism, praised a strong work ethic, and regarded wealth as a confirmation of God’s benevolence, that in doing so it created favourable conditions for investment as an alternative to consumption, and that it thus contributed to the rise of capitalism.2 Schama argued that this theory does not explain the situation in the seventeenth-century Dutch Republic very well, because despite the dominance of Calvinism, the Dutch Republic witnessed a strong consumerist culture. Moreover, Calvinism was far from unique in its critique of wealth. Most importantly, however, Calvinists often criticized
“非尤伯斯的荷兰”:哈德里亚努斯·朱尼厄斯《巴达维亚》中财富的古典尴尬与地方历史的建构
至少从1987年开始,西蒙·沙玛发表了他著名的研究《财富的尴尬》:在《黄金时代的荷兰文化解读》一书中,众所周知,在近代早期低地国家,或者至少在荷兰,财富和集体认同的概念之间存在着强烈的联系。在这本书中,年轻的荷兰共和国无与伦比的财富和无限的消费主义与17世纪占主导地位的道德主义话语形成了对比,这种话语通常对贪婪、奢侈和浪费金钱持敌视态度。根据Schama的说法,这种矛盾的现象与马克斯·韦伯的著名论点不一致,即加尔文主义谴责消费主义,赞扬强烈的职业道德,并将财富视为上帝仁慈的证实,这样做为投资创造了有利条件,作为消费的替代,因此它促进了资本主义的兴起Schama认为这个理论并不能很好地解释17世纪荷兰共和国的情况,因为尽管加尔文主义占主导地位,荷兰共和国见证了强烈的消费主义文化。此外,加尔文主义对财富的批判远非独一无二。然而,最重要的是,加尔文主义者经常受到批评
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信