Evaluating A Mobile App for Data Collection in Occupational Therapy Practice

Tanja Svarre, Marie Bangsgaard Bang, Tine Bieber Lunn
{"title":"Evaluating A Mobile App for Data Collection in Occupational Therapy Practice","authors":"Tanja Svarre, Marie Bangsgaard Bang, Tine Bieber Lunn","doi":"10.5772/intechopen.102084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates the use of a mobile app for data collection in occupational therapy practice. Seven occupational therapists used a mobile app to collect data on housing-adaptation home visits for a period of two months. The occupational therapists documented five home visits on an online diary to document their use of the mobile app. Subsequently, a follow-up focus-group interview was conducted to discuss the diary results and elaborate on the use of the app in occupational therapy practice. The benefits of using the mobile app include the app’s systematic approach, ease of navigation, and the automation of data collection steps. Limitations include the inability to capture the complexity of the practice. Thus, the occupational therapists to some extent experienced that the need to use the mobile app is an added task in therapists’ daily work that did not reflect their current practice. Future transformations of paper-based tools must be conducted in a way that closely reflects the work processes in clinical practice. This study suggests that a digitized tool holds significant potential for developing clinical practice, but digitization does not change the issues or the complexity associated with the tool itself or the existing practice.","PeriodicalId":169729,"journal":{"name":"Primary Health Care [Working Title]","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primary Health Care [Working Title]","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.102084","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the use of a mobile app for data collection in occupational therapy practice. Seven occupational therapists used a mobile app to collect data on housing-adaptation home visits for a period of two months. The occupational therapists documented five home visits on an online diary to document their use of the mobile app. Subsequently, a follow-up focus-group interview was conducted to discuss the diary results and elaborate on the use of the app in occupational therapy practice. The benefits of using the mobile app include the app’s systematic approach, ease of navigation, and the automation of data collection steps. Limitations include the inability to capture the complexity of the practice. Thus, the occupational therapists to some extent experienced that the need to use the mobile app is an added task in therapists’ daily work that did not reflect their current practice. Future transformations of paper-based tools must be conducted in a way that closely reflects the work processes in clinical practice. This study suggests that a digitized tool holds significant potential for developing clinical practice, but digitization does not change the issues or the complexity associated with the tool itself or the existing practice.
评估一个移动应用程序的数据收集在职业治疗实践
本研究调查了在职业治疗实践中使用移动应用程序进行数据收集。七名职业治疗师使用一款移动应用程序收集了为期两个月的住房适应家访数据。职业治疗师在在线日记中记录了五次家访,以记录他们对移动应用程序的使用情况。随后,进行了一次后续焦点小组访谈,讨论日记的结果,并详细说明该应用程序在职业治疗实践中的使用情况。使用移动应用程序的好处包括应用程序的系统方法,易于导航和数据收集步骤的自动化。限制包括无法捕捉实践的复杂性。因此,职业治疗师在一定程度上体会到,需要使用移动应用程序是治疗师日常工作中的一项额外任务,与他们目前的实践不相符。未来纸质工具的转变必须以一种密切反映临床实践工作过程的方式进行。这项研究表明,数字化工具具有发展临床实践的巨大潜力,但数字化并没有改变与工具本身或现有实践相关的问题或复杂性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信