The Ethics of Doing Web Science Research: Panel Abstract

K. Kinder-Kurlanda, P. Boldi
{"title":"The Ethics of Doing Web Science Research: Panel Abstract","authors":"K. Kinder-Kurlanda, P. Boldi","doi":"10.1145/3091478.3098883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The panel continues the discussion of ethics within web science from previous years. Beyond fundamental notions such as privacy and intellectual property new challenges arise continuously for researchers as new technologies, platforms, contingencies and people become involved in building the web. Examples for ethical challenges include crowdsourcing as a method, social media data sharing, and, most recently, social media reliability. In the face of \"fake news\", trolling, cyberbullying and automated content the question is whom to trust: are social media more or less reliable than traditional media? who should regulate their content? using which criteria? and what is the impact on research?","PeriodicalId":165747,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Web Science Conference","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Web Science Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3091478.3098883","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The panel continues the discussion of ethics within web science from previous years. Beyond fundamental notions such as privacy and intellectual property new challenges arise continuously for researchers as new technologies, platforms, contingencies and people become involved in building the web. Examples for ethical challenges include crowdsourcing as a method, social media data sharing, and, most recently, social media reliability. In the face of "fake news", trolling, cyberbullying and automated content the question is whom to trust: are social media more or less reliable than traditional media? who should regulate their content? using which criteria? and what is the impact on research?
网络科学研究的伦理:小组摘要
该小组继续讨论前几年网络科学中的伦理问题。除了隐私和知识产权等基本概念之外,随着新技术、新平台、新事件和人们参与到网络建设中来,研究人员面临的新挑战不断出现。道德挑战的例子包括众包作为一种方法,社交媒体数据共享,以及最近的社交媒体可靠性。面对“假新闻”、网络喷子、网络欺凌和自动化内容,问题是该信任谁:社交媒体比传统媒体更可靠还是更不可靠?谁应该监管它们的内容?使用什么标准?对研究有什么影响?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信