Energy planning under uncertain decision-making environment: An evidential reasoning approach to prioritize renewable energy sources

Hamza Sellak, B. Ouhbi, B. Frikh
{"title":"Energy planning under uncertain decision-making environment: An evidential reasoning approach to prioritize renewable energy sources","authors":"Hamza Sellak, B. Ouhbi, B. Frikh","doi":"10.4114/INTARTIF.VOL20ISS59PP21-31","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nowadays, making strategic decisions in a sensitive sector such as energy planning that usually requiresallocating huge funds, time, and resources is a difficult task. For instance, prioritizing a set of Renewable EnergySources (RES) is a complex multi-dimensional task that typically involves a range of conflicting criteria featuringdifferent forms of evaluation data in an uncertain decision-making environment. This process is aligned withseveral sources that can be uncertain, including imprecise information, limited domain knowledge from decisionmakers,and failures to provide accurate judgments from experts. In this study, we propose to use the EvidentialReasoning (ER) approach to manage the expanding complexities and uncertainties in RES prioritization problem.The ER approach is employed as a multiple criteria framework to assess the appropriateness regarding the use ofdifferent renewable energy technologies. A case study is provided to illustrate the implementation process. Resultsshow that using the ER approach when assessing the sustainability of different RES under uncertainty allowsproviding robust decisions, which brings out a more accurate, effective, and better-informed decision-making toolto conduct the evaluation process.","PeriodicalId":176050,"journal":{"name":"Inteligencia Artif.","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inteligencia Artif.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4114/INTARTIF.VOL20ISS59PP21-31","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Nowadays, making strategic decisions in a sensitive sector such as energy planning that usually requiresallocating huge funds, time, and resources is a difficult task. For instance, prioritizing a set of Renewable EnergySources (RES) is a complex multi-dimensional task that typically involves a range of conflicting criteria featuringdifferent forms of evaluation data in an uncertain decision-making environment. This process is aligned withseveral sources that can be uncertain, including imprecise information, limited domain knowledge from decisionmakers,and failures to provide accurate judgments from experts. In this study, we propose to use the EvidentialReasoning (ER) approach to manage the expanding complexities and uncertainties in RES prioritization problem.The ER approach is employed as a multiple criteria framework to assess the appropriateness regarding the use ofdifferent renewable energy technologies. A case study is provided to illustrate the implementation process. Resultsshow that using the ER approach when assessing the sustainability of different RES under uncertainty allowsproviding robust decisions, which brings out a more accurate, effective, and better-informed decision-making toolto conduct the evaluation process.
不确定决策环境下的能源规划:可再生能源优先级的证据推理方法
如今,在能源规划等敏感领域做出战略决策通常需要分配大量资金、时间和资源,这是一项艰巨的任务。例如,确定一组可再生能源(RES)的优先级是一项复杂的多维任务,通常涉及一系列相互冲突的标准,这些标准在不确定的决策环境中具有不同形式的评估数据。这个过程与几个不确定的来源一致,包括不精确的信息,决策者有限的领域知识,以及专家无法提供准确的判断。在本研究中,我们提出使用证据推理(ER)方法来管理RES优先级问题中不断扩大的复杂性和不确定性。ER方法作为一个多标准框架来评估不同可再生能源技术使用的适当性。提供了一个案例研究来说明实施过程。结果表明,在不确定性条件下,利用生态资源可持续性评估方法可以提供稳健的决策,从而提供更准确、有效和更明智的决策工具来进行评估过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信