A verification of class structure evolution model and its parameters

M. Ohki, Shinjiro Akiyama, Y. Kambayashi
{"title":"A verification of class structure evolution model and its parameters","authors":"M. Ohki, Shinjiro Akiyama, Y. Kambayashi","doi":"10.1145/512035.512049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is widely accepted that the role of software \"architect\" that provide frameworks to program developers is important in the object-oriented software development processes. When developers try to extend the base classes given by the architect, they may want some guidelines that tell them how many subclasses and how many methods in one subclass are reasonable. So far we are not aware of such guidelines. Through measurements of Java and Delphi class libraries, we have distilled formulae that forecast the number of methods and the number of subclasses when constructing class trees from the base classes. We propose that we should focus to extract methods and attributes rather than class structure. The formulae we have formulated support this proposition.","PeriodicalId":321820,"journal":{"name":"International Workshop on Principles of Software Evolution","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Workshop on Principles of Software Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/512035.512049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

It is widely accepted that the role of software "architect" that provide frameworks to program developers is important in the object-oriented software development processes. When developers try to extend the base classes given by the architect, they may want some guidelines that tell them how many subclasses and how many methods in one subclass are reasonable. So far we are not aware of such guidelines. Through measurements of Java and Delphi class libraries, we have distilled formulae that forecast the number of methods and the number of subclasses when constructing class trees from the base classes. We propose that we should focus to extract methods and attributes rather than class structure. The formulae we have formulated support this proposition.
类结构演化模型及其参数的验证
在面向对象的软件开发过程中,为程序开发人员提供框架的软件“架构师”的角色是很重要的,这一点被广泛接受。当开发人员尝试扩展架构师给出的基类时,他们可能需要一些指导方针来告诉他们在一个子类中有多少子类和多少方法是合理的。到目前为止,我们还不知道有这样的指导方针。通过对Java和Delphi类库的测量,我们得到了从基类构造类树时预测方法数量和子类数量的公式。我们建议将重点放在提取方法和属性上,而不是类结构上。我们制定的公式支持这一主张。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信