TOWARDS AN ECLECTIC APPROACH IN AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDER (ASD)-SMARTS (SEQUENTIAL MULTIPLE ASSIGNMENT RANDOMIZED TRIALS-SMARTS)

C. Hațegan, D. Talaș, R. Trifu
{"title":"TOWARDS AN ECLECTIC APPROACH IN AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDER (ASD)-SMARTS (SEQUENTIAL MULTIPLE ASSIGNMENT RANDOMIZED TRIALS-SMARTS)","authors":"C. Hațegan, D. Talaș, R. Trifu","doi":"10.36315/2022v2end076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\"The need for evidence-based therapy is a reality in contemporary therapeutic approaches. The most studied approach in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is the ABA therapy (Applied Behavioral Analysis), among other 27 validated programs Hume & al. (2021) and Steinbrenner & al. (2020). Even if ABA is well known and strongly scientifically studied, in almost 30% of the cases it does not lead to developing the desired verbal communication abilities ((National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, 2010; Kasari, Sturm, Shih, 2018). In this context, speech and language therapy can be an alternative to this approach, its use being combined with the usage of different other psychological and psycho-pedagogical techniques and programs for enhancing children and families with the target abilities. This mixture of therapies, known as eclectic approach is often compared with ABA approach and criticized due to its lack of scientific proof. In order to ensure the evidence based approach we propose the implementation of SMARTs (Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trials-SMARTs). The SMARTs approach offers the possibility both to collect measurable data based on the established goals and to tailor possible intervention programs adjusting the approach to participants’ needs. In our research the SMARTs structure include: a sequence of decisions (it applies if participants do not respond positively to the intervention and it is used at each three months’ reevaluation stage), a set of intervention decisions (in this research SLT is combined with kineto-therapy, oral-motor myofunctional therapy, psych-pedagogical programs and programs for sensory integration), elements/factors that indicate change in the established approach (it refers to factors that prove that the intervention program needs to be changed, in our research these are: regression and a plateau in speech and language development acquisition longer than one month) and a sequence of decision rules able to link the other sequences (these decision rules are based on the evaluation and reevaluation results and on reaching or not the established goals in speech and language development area). Participants in the research are 9 children with severe ASD (N=9), with ages between 6-9 years’ old. The starting point of our SMARTs approach implementation was a comprehensive general assessment of speech and language development based on ISD (Integrated Scale of Development), MLU (Mean Length of Utterance) and SIR (Scale for Intelligibility Rate). The intervention period was January 2021-december 2021. Results demonstrated relevant gains in speech and language development of 6-9 months (based on ISD) and of 3 points based on SIR (from 2 level-just of words intelligible, till 5 level-all words intelligible). Very poor results were obtained at the MLU level, due to the fact that grammar approach is difficult to implement. In conclusion we can underline the fact that SMARTs can be a reliable way in individualizing and in collecting scientific proof about speech and language development in ASD context, based on eclectic intervention programs. Further research will be developed in order to tailor the morphological and syntactical aspect in speech and language development.\"","PeriodicalId":404891,"journal":{"name":"Education and New Developments 2022 – Volume 2","volume":"19 4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education and New Developments 2022 – Volume 2","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36315/2022v2end076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

"The need for evidence-based therapy is a reality in contemporary therapeutic approaches. The most studied approach in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is the ABA therapy (Applied Behavioral Analysis), among other 27 validated programs Hume & al. (2021) and Steinbrenner & al. (2020). Even if ABA is well known and strongly scientifically studied, in almost 30% of the cases it does not lead to developing the desired verbal communication abilities ((National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, 2010; Kasari, Sturm, Shih, 2018). In this context, speech and language therapy can be an alternative to this approach, its use being combined with the usage of different other psychological and psycho-pedagogical techniques and programs for enhancing children and families with the target abilities. This mixture of therapies, known as eclectic approach is often compared with ABA approach and criticized due to its lack of scientific proof. In order to ensure the evidence based approach we propose the implementation of SMARTs (Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trials-SMARTs). The SMARTs approach offers the possibility both to collect measurable data based on the established goals and to tailor possible intervention programs adjusting the approach to participants’ needs. In our research the SMARTs structure include: a sequence of decisions (it applies if participants do not respond positively to the intervention and it is used at each three months’ reevaluation stage), a set of intervention decisions (in this research SLT is combined with kineto-therapy, oral-motor myofunctional therapy, psych-pedagogical programs and programs for sensory integration), elements/factors that indicate change in the established approach (it refers to factors that prove that the intervention program needs to be changed, in our research these are: regression and a plateau in speech and language development acquisition longer than one month) and a sequence of decision rules able to link the other sequences (these decision rules are based on the evaluation and reevaluation results and on reaching or not the established goals in speech and language development area). Participants in the research are 9 children with severe ASD (N=9), with ages between 6-9 years’ old. The starting point of our SMARTs approach implementation was a comprehensive general assessment of speech and language development based on ISD (Integrated Scale of Development), MLU (Mean Length of Utterance) and SIR (Scale for Intelligibility Rate). The intervention period was January 2021-december 2021. Results demonstrated relevant gains in speech and language development of 6-9 months (based on ISD) and of 3 points based on SIR (from 2 level-just of words intelligible, till 5 level-all words intelligible). Very poor results were obtained at the MLU level, due to the fact that grammar approach is difficult to implement. In conclusion we can underline the fact that SMARTs can be a reliable way in individualizing and in collecting scientific proof about speech and language development in ASD context, based on eclectic intervention programs. Further research will be developed in order to tailor the morphological and syntactical aspect in speech and language development."
面向自闭症谱系障碍(asd)- smart的折衷方法(顺序多任务随机试验- smart)
“对循证治疗的需求是当代治疗方法的现实。在自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)中,研究最多的方法是ABA疗法(应用行为分析),以及其他27个经过验证的项目Hume & al.(2021)和Steinbrenner & al.(2020)。即使ABA是众所周知的,并得到了强有力的科学研究,在近30%的情况下,它并没有导致发展所需的语言交流能力((国家耳聋和其他交流障碍研究所,2010;Kasari, Sturm, Shih, 2018)。在这种情况下,言语和语言治疗可以替代这种方法,它的使用与其他不同的心理和心理教学技术和计划的使用相结合,以提高具有目标能力的儿童和家庭。这种混合疗法,被称为折衷方法,经常与ABA方法进行比较,并因缺乏科学证据而受到批评。为了确保基于证据的方法,我们提出实施SMARTs(顺序多分配随机试验-SMARTs)。SMARTs方法提供了基于既定目标收集可测量数据的可能性,并根据参与者的需求调整方法来定制可能的干预方案。在我们的研究中,SMARTs结构包括:一系列决定(如果参与者对干预没有积极反应,它适用于每三个月的重新评估阶段),一组干预决定(在本研究中,SLT与运动疗法、口腔运动肌功能疗法、心理教学计划和感觉统合计划相结合),表明既定方法发生变化的要素/因素(它指的是证明干预计划需要改变的因素,在我们的研究中,这些是:回归和语音和语言发展习得的平台期超过一个月),以及能够连接其他序列的决策规则序列(这些决策规则基于评估和再评估结果以及是否达到既定的语音和语言发展目标)。该研究的参与者是9名患有严重ASD的儿童(N=9),年龄在6-9岁之间。我们实施SMARTs方法的出发点是基于ISD(综合发展量表)、MLU(平均话语长度)和SIR(可理解率量表)对语音和语言发展进行全面的一般评估。干预期为2021年1月至2021年12月。结果显示,6-9个月的语音和语言发展(基于ISD)和基于SIR的3分(从2级-仅可理解单词,到5级-所有单词可理解)的相关收益。由于语法方法难以实现,因此在MLU层面获得了非常糟糕的结果。总之,我们可以强调这样一个事实,即基于折衷的干预计划,SMARTs在个性化和收集关于ASD背景下言语和语言发展的科学证据方面是一种可靠的方式。进一步的研究将在言语和语言发展的形态和句法方面展开。”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信