How Online Trust and Online Brand Equity Translate Online- and Omni-Channel-Specific Instruments into Repurchase Intentions

Bernhard Swoboda, A. Winters, Nils Fränzel
{"title":"How Online Trust and Online Brand Equity Translate Online- and Omni-Channel-Specific Instruments into Repurchase Intentions","authors":"Bernhard Swoboda, A. Winters, Nils Fränzel","doi":"10.15358/0344-1369-2021-1-2-37","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines omni-channel retailers’ online activities, which previous brick-and-mortar firms’ find challenging, but they are increasingly competing with online players. Therefore, the role of major online-specific instruments such as online aesthetic appeal and omni-channel-specific instruments such as online-offline integration is studied. A framework is proposed in which online trust, as a key mediator in online studies, translates instruments into repurchase intentions. However, the authors also study online brand equity, believing in its strength for repurchasing in competing, reciprocal mediation. They test indirect effects of the instruments in a sequential mediation study and reciprocal effects of trust and brand equity in a cross-lagged panel study based on longitudinal data of consumer evaluations of fashion retailers. Importantly, cross-channel repurchase intention is differentiated. The results provide new empirical evidence of a different relative importance of the instruments and of online trust versus online brand equity. The findings have direct implications for managers interested in understanding which instruments most affect consumer outcomes.","PeriodicalId":446283,"journal":{"name":"Marketing ZFP","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marketing ZFP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15358/0344-1369-2021-1-2-37","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines omni-channel retailers’ online activities, which previous brick-and-mortar firms’ find challenging, but they are increasingly competing with online players. Therefore, the role of major online-specific instruments such as online aesthetic appeal and omni-channel-specific instruments such as online-offline integration is studied. A framework is proposed in which online trust, as a key mediator in online studies, translates instruments into repurchase intentions. However, the authors also study online brand equity, believing in its strength for repurchasing in competing, reciprocal mediation. They test indirect effects of the instruments in a sequential mediation study and reciprocal effects of trust and brand equity in a cross-lagged panel study based on longitudinal data of consumer evaluations of fashion retailers. Importantly, cross-channel repurchase intention is differentiated. The results provide new empirical evidence of a different relative importance of the instruments and of online trust versus online brand equity. The findings have direct implications for managers interested in understanding which instruments most affect consumer outcomes.
在线信任和在线品牌资产如何将在线和全渠道特定工具转化为回购意愿
这项研究考察了全渠道零售商的在线活动,这是以前实体公司发现的挑战,但他们越来越多地与在线玩家竞争。因此,本文研究了线上审美诉求等主要线上专用工具和线上线下整合等全渠道专用工具的作用。本文提出了一个框架,在这个框架中,在线信任作为在线研究中的关键中介,将工具转化为回购意愿。然而,作者也研究了在线品牌资产,相信它在竞争、互惠中介中的再购买力量。他们在顺序中介研究中测试了这些工具的间接影响,并在基于消费者对时装零售商评价的纵向数据的交叉滞后面板研究中测试了信任和品牌资产的相互影响。重要的是,跨渠道回购意愿是差异化的。研究结果提供了新的经验证据,证明工具和在线信任与在线品牌资产的相对重要性不同。研究结果对那些想要了解哪些工具对消费者结果影响最大的管理者有直接的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信