Experimental analysis of score functions in multi-criteria decision-making with intuitionistic fuzzy sets

Ting-Yu Chen
{"title":"Experimental analysis of score functions in multi-criteria decision-making with intuitionistic fuzzy sets","authors":"Ting-Yu Chen","doi":"10.1080/10170669.2010.551789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this article is to examine individual differences of various score functions in multiple criteria decision analysis based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets (IFSs). A review of the literature indicates that score functions have been widely used in multi-criteria evaluations from a variety of research fields. There exist several types of score functions to identify the mixed result of positive and negative parts in a bi-dimensional framework of IFSs. However, very few studies have conducted a comparative analysis of different score functions. Considering various perspectives of score functions, this study developed an integrated programming model to cope with the problems of incompletely known membership grades and positivity and negativity biases by utilizing both deviation variables and weighted score functions. An experimental analysis was conducted to examine the relationship between the results yielded from different score functions with discussions on average Spearman correlation coefficients and contradiction rates. Additional discussions are made to clarify the relative differences in the ranking orders obtained from different combinations of numbers of alternatives and criteria and for different importance conditions.","PeriodicalId":369256,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The Chinese Institute of Industrial Engineers","volume":"465 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The Chinese Institute of Industrial Engineers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10170669.2010.551789","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to examine individual differences of various score functions in multiple criteria decision analysis based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets (IFSs). A review of the literature indicates that score functions have been widely used in multi-criteria evaluations from a variety of research fields. There exist several types of score functions to identify the mixed result of positive and negative parts in a bi-dimensional framework of IFSs. However, very few studies have conducted a comparative analysis of different score functions. Considering various perspectives of score functions, this study developed an integrated programming model to cope with the problems of incompletely known membership grades and positivity and negativity biases by utilizing both deviation variables and weighted score functions. An experimental analysis was conducted to examine the relationship between the results yielded from different score functions with discussions on average Spearman correlation coefficients and contradiction rates. Additional discussions are made to clarify the relative differences in the ranking orders obtained from different combinations of numbers of alternatives and criteria and for different importance conditions.
直觉模糊集多准则决策中得分函数的实验分析
本文的目的是研究基于直觉模糊集(ifs)的多准则决策分析中各种得分函数的个体差异。回顾文献表明,分数函数已广泛应用于各种研究领域的多标准评估。在ifs的二维框架中,存在几种类型的分数函数来识别正负部分的混合结果。然而,很少有研究对不同的分数函数进行比较分析。考虑到分数函数的不同角度,本研究利用偏差变量和加权分数函数建立了一个综合规划模型,以解决隶属度等级不完全已知和正、负偏差的问题。通过实验分析,讨论了平均Spearman相关系数和矛盾率,考察了不同得分函数所得结果之间的关系。本文还进行了进一步的讨论,以澄清从备选方案和标准数量的不同组合以及不同重要性条件中获得的排序顺序的相对差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信