Fulfillment of contractual obligations in Ukraine: problems of legislative provision in the conditions of martial law

A. Kolisnyk, A. Landina
{"title":"Fulfillment of contractual obligations in Ukraine: problems of legislative provision in the conditions of martial law","authors":"A. Kolisnyk, A. Landina","doi":"10.33098/2078-6670.2022.14.26.156-162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to solve the problem of prosecution for non-fulfillment of economic contractual obligations under martial law. Methodology. This study was carried out in a clear sequence, following the stages of studying the problem, based on the logic of the presentation of the material, with the aim of achieving the goals set in the article and fulfilling the defined tasks. During the research, such methods as the information-analytical method were used; system approach method; method of comparison and comparison; method of descriptive analysis; method of pragmatic approach; forecasting method. The results. It was established that criminal liability for non-fulfillment or improper fulfillment of economic contractual obligations is not provided for by the current criminal legislation of Ukraine, although enforcement of such obligations (in particular, in critical conditions of martial law) by criminal legal means is appropriate and necessary. The scientific novelty is that we propose to eliminate this gap by including in the Special Part of the Criminal Code of Ukraine Art. 2061, which will establish liability for breach of contract terms, namely, will provide for liability for non-fulfillment or improper fulfillment of economic contractual obligations, if this resulted in large losses (the amount of such losses, namely those that are 500 or more times greater than the tax-free the minimum income of citizens, to be provided in the note to the specified article). As circumstances that will aggravate the punishment for the specified act, it is worth predicting a particularly large amount, which led to particularly significant losses (which are 1000 or more times greater than the tax-free minimum income of citizens), which should also be indicated in the note to this norm; repeatedly, that is, by a person who previously committed such a criminal offense; by a group of persons based on a prior conspiracy and others, if the specified acts are committed in the presence of other significant aggravating circumstances that will affect the type and amount of punishment. Practical significance. This study does not exhaust the indicated problems, but opens the prospect of further research in the field of ensuring the fulfillment of contractual economic obligations.","PeriodicalId":303771,"journal":{"name":"Scientific and informational bulletin of Ivano-Frankivsk University of Law named after King Danylo Halytskyi","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific and informational bulletin of Ivano-Frankivsk University of Law named after King Danylo Halytskyi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33098/2078-6670.2022.14.26.156-162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to solve the problem of prosecution for non-fulfillment of economic contractual obligations under martial law. Methodology. This study was carried out in a clear sequence, following the stages of studying the problem, based on the logic of the presentation of the material, with the aim of achieving the goals set in the article and fulfilling the defined tasks. During the research, such methods as the information-analytical method were used; system approach method; method of comparison and comparison; method of descriptive analysis; method of pragmatic approach; forecasting method. The results. It was established that criminal liability for non-fulfillment or improper fulfillment of economic contractual obligations is not provided for by the current criminal legislation of Ukraine, although enforcement of such obligations (in particular, in critical conditions of martial law) by criminal legal means is appropriate and necessary. The scientific novelty is that we propose to eliminate this gap by including in the Special Part of the Criminal Code of Ukraine Art. 2061, which will establish liability for breach of contract terms, namely, will provide for liability for non-fulfillment or improper fulfillment of economic contractual obligations, if this resulted in large losses (the amount of such losses, namely those that are 500 or more times greater than the tax-free the minimum income of citizens, to be provided in the note to the specified article). As circumstances that will aggravate the punishment for the specified act, it is worth predicting a particularly large amount, which led to particularly significant losses (which are 1000 or more times greater than the tax-free minimum income of citizens), which should also be indicated in the note to this norm; repeatedly, that is, by a person who previously committed such a criminal offense; by a group of persons based on a prior conspiracy and others, if the specified acts are committed in the presence of other significant aggravating circumstances that will affect the type and amount of punishment. Practical significance. This study does not exhaust the indicated problems, but opens the prospect of further research in the field of ensuring the fulfillment of contractual economic obligations.
乌克兰合同义务的履行:戒严法条件下的立法规定问题
本研究的目的在于解决戒严法下经济契约义务不履行的起诉问题。方法。本研究以明确的顺序进行,遵循研究问题的阶段,基于材料呈现的逻辑,旨在实现文章中设定的目标并完成定义的任务。在研究过程中,采用了信息分析法等方法;系统方法;比较和比较的方法;描述性分析方法;实用方法;预测方法。结果。已经确定,乌克兰目前的刑事立法没有规定不履行或不当履行经济合同义务的刑事责任,尽管以刑事法律手段执行这种义务(特别是在戒严令的危急情况下)是适当和必要的。科学上的新颖之处在于,我们建议通过在乌克兰刑法特别部分第2061条中列入违反合同条款的责任,即规定不履行或不当履行经济合同义务的责任,如果这导致了巨大的损失(这种损失的金额,即那些超过公民免税最低收入500倍或更多的损失),须在指明物品的附注内提供)。对加重特定行为处罚的,数额特别大,造成特别重大损失(比公民免税最低收入高出1000倍以上)的,值得预测的,并应在本规范附注中注明;多次,即由以前犯过这种刑事罪行的人;一群人基于先前的共谋和其他人,如果特定行为是在存在其他重大加重情节的情况下实施的,这些情节将影响处罚的类型和数额。现实意义。本研究并没有穷尽所指出的问题,但为保障合同经济义务的履行这一领域的进一步研究开辟了前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信