Charles Calderwood, P. Ackerman
{"title":"The Relative Salience of Daily and Enduring Influences on Off-Job Reactions to Work Stress.","authors":"Charles Calderwood, P. Ackerman","doi":"10.1002/smi.2665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Work stress is an important determinant of employee health and wellness. The occupational health community is recognizing that one contributor to these relationships may be the presence of negative off-job reactivity to work, which we argue involves continued thoughts directed towards work (cognitive reactivity), continued negative mood stemming from work (affective reactivity), and the alteration of post-work behaviours in response to work factors (behavioural reactivity). We explored the relative contributions of daily work stressors, affective traits, and subjective job stress perceptions to negative off-job reactivity. These relationships were evaluated in a study of hospital nurses (n = 75), who completed trait measures and then provided self-assessments of daily work stress and off-job reactions for four work days. The results of several multilevel analyses indicated that a main-effects model best described the data when predicting cognitive, affective, and behavioural reactivity from daily work stressors, affective traits, and subjective job stress perceptions. A series of multilevel dominance analyses revealed that subjective job stress perceptions dominated the prediction of behavioural reactivity, while trait negative affect dominated the prediction of affective reactivity. Theoretical implications and the relative salience of daily and enduring contributors to negative off-job reactivity are discussed. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.","PeriodicalId":309674,"journal":{"name":"Stress and health : journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stress and health : journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.2665","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
对工作压力的非工作反应的日常影响和持久影响的相对显著性。
工作压力是员工健康的重要决定因素。职业卫生界认识到,造成这些关系的一个因素可能是对工作的消极反应,我们认为这包括对工作的持续思考(认知反应),源于工作的持续消极情绪(情感反应),以及对工作因素的工作后行为的改变(行为反应)。我们探讨了日常工作压力源、情感特质和主观工作压力感知对负性离职反应的相对贡献。这些关系在一项对医院护士(n = 75)的研究中得到了评估,这些护士完成了特质测量,然后在四个工作日内提供了日常工作压力和下班反应的自我评估。几个多层次分析的结果表明,当预测日常工作压力源、情感特征和主观工作压力感知的认知、情感和行为反应时,一个主效应模型最能描述数据。一系列多层次优势分析表明,主观工作压力感知主导行为反应的预测,而特质负面影响主导情感反应的预测。理论含义和相对显著的日常和持久贡献者的负面工作反应进行了讨论。版权所有©2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。