Influence Usage of Media Platforms in Improving Uptake of Academic Library Services in Selected Universities in Kenya

Litzer Aoko Opiyo, Wambiri Muthee
{"title":"Influence Usage of Media Platforms in Improving Uptake of Academic Library Services in Selected Universities in Kenya","authors":"Litzer Aoko Opiyo, Wambiri Muthee","doi":"10.35942/ijcab.v6i3.281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The significance of social media in academic library cannot be overstressed. The evolution of Information technology in academic libraries has presented change in users’ views, demands, alterations in library services and changes in library staff functions. Academic Libraries have adopted and embraced various social media tools. However, there seems to be no clear picture on how exactly the social media technologies are being used by staff in the library for academic library services. This study was on utilization of social media platforms in improving uptake of academic library services in selected universities in Kenya. The study was basically narrowed to selected public university libraries in Kitui and Muranga Counties. The study aimed at achieving examining the factors influencing the use of social media in improving the uptake of academic library services. The study adopted Technology Acceptance Model as its conceptual framework. Descriptive research design was adopted, applying qualitative and quantitative methods. The target population comprised of two selected public university libraries in Kitui and Muranga Counties. The total sample size was 17 Librarians inclusive of the Chief University Librarians while total sample size for postgraduate students was 400. Literature was reviewed based on the objectives of the study. Semi-structured questionnaires were tools used for collection of data. Pilot study was carried out at Kenyatta university Kitui campus library which had similar characteristics to the libraries where the research was done to determine the reliability and validity of data collection tools. From the analysis of the collected data, the study established seventeen (17) different types of social media platforms that are currently being used to enhance uptake of the academic libraries’ services. Facebook and YouTube were the most outstanding of the platforms. Internet connectivity stood out among the factors influencing the use of social media platforms to enhance uptake of library and information services. \n ","PeriodicalId":119984,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Current Aspects","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Current Aspects","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35942/ijcab.v6i3.281","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The significance of social media in academic library cannot be overstressed. The evolution of Information technology in academic libraries has presented change in users’ views, demands, alterations in library services and changes in library staff functions. Academic Libraries have adopted and embraced various social media tools. However, there seems to be no clear picture on how exactly the social media technologies are being used by staff in the library for academic library services. This study was on utilization of social media platforms in improving uptake of academic library services in selected universities in Kenya. The study was basically narrowed to selected public university libraries in Kitui and Muranga Counties. The study aimed at achieving examining the factors influencing the use of social media in improving the uptake of academic library services. The study adopted Technology Acceptance Model as its conceptual framework. Descriptive research design was adopted, applying qualitative and quantitative methods. The target population comprised of two selected public university libraries in Kitui and Muranga Counties. The total sample size was 17 Librarians inclusive of the Chief University Librarians while total sample size for postgraduate students was 400. Literature was reviewed based on the objectives of the study. Semi-structured questionnaires were tools used for collection of data. Pilot study was carried out at Kenyatta university Kitui campus library which had similar characteristics to the libraries where the research was done to determine the reliability and validity of data collection tools. From the analysis of the collected data, the study established seventeen (17) different types of social media platforms that are currently being used to enhance uptake of the academic libraries’ services. Facebook and YouTube were the most outstanding of the platforms. Internet connectivity stood out among the factors influencing the use of social media platforms to enhance uptake of library and information services.  
媒体平台的使用对肯尼亚选定大学提高学术图书馆服务吸收的影响
社交媒体在高校图书馆中的重要性怎么强调都不为过。高校图书馆信息技术的发展带来了用户观念和需求的变化、图书馆服务的变化和图书馆工作人员职能的变化。学术图书馆已经采用并接受了各种社交媒体工具。然而,对于图书馆工作人员如何将社交媒体技术用于学术图书馆服务,似乎还没有清晰的描述。这项研究是关于利用社交媒体平台改善肯尼亚选定大学对学术图书馆服务的吸收。这项研究基本上局限于基图伊县和穆兰加县选定的公立大学图书馆。这项研究的目的是研究影响社会媒体使用的因素,以提高对学术图书馆服务的吸收。本研究采用技术接受模型作为概念框架。采用描述性研究设计,采用定性与定量相结合的方法。目标人口包括基图伊县和穆兰加县两个选定的公立大学图书馆。总样本量为17名图书馆员,包括大学首席图书馆员,而研究生的总样本量为400名。根据研究目的对文献进行综述。半结构化问卷是收集数据的工具。在肯雅塔大学基图伊校园图书馆进行了试点研究,该图书馆与进行研究的图书馆具有相似的特征,以确定数据收集工具的可靠性和有效性。通过对收集到的数据的分析,该研究建立了17种不同类型的社交媒体平台,这些平台目前被用于提高学术图书馆服务的使用率。Facebook和YouTube是这些平台中最突出的。互联网连通性是影响使用社交媒体平台以提高图书馆和信息服务使用率的因素之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信