Using time-based musculoskeletal risk assessment methods to assess worker well-being in optimizations in a welding station design

Aitor Iriondo Pascual, Elia Mora, D. Högberg, L. Hanson, Mikael Lebram, Dan Lämkull
{"title":"Using time-based musculoskeletal risk assessment methods to assess worker well-being in optimizations in a welding station design","authors":"Aitor Iriondo Pascual, Elia Mora, D. Högberg, L. Hanson, Mikael Lebram, Dan Lämkull","doi":"10.17077/dhm.31746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Simulation using virtual models is used widely in industries because it enables efficient creation, testing, and optimization of the design of products and production systems in virtual worlds. Simulation is also used in the design of workstations to assess worker well-being by using digital human modelling (DHM) tools. DHM tools typically include musculoskeletal risk assessment methods, such as RULA, REBA, OWAS, and NIOSH Lifting Equation, that can be used to study, analyse, and evaluate the risk of work-related musculoskeletal disorders of different design solutions in a proactive manner. However, most musculoskeletal risk assessment methods implemented in DHM tools are in essence made to assess static instances only. Also, the methods are typically made to support manual observations of the work rather than by algorithms in a software. This means that, when simulating full work sequences to evaluate manikins’ well-being, using these methods becomes problematic in terms of the legitimacy of the evaluation results. In addition to that, to consider objectives in optimizations they should be measurable with real numbers, which most of musculoskeletal risk assessment methods cannot provide when simulating full work sequences. In this study, we implemented the musculoskeletal risk assessment method OWAS in a digital tool connected to the DHM tool IPS IMMA. We applied the Lundqvist index on top of the OWAS whole body risk category score","PeriodicalId":111717,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 7th International Digital Human Modeling Symposium (DHM 2022) and Iowa Virtual Human Summit 2022 -","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 7th International Digital Human Modeling Symposium (DHM 2022) and Iowa Virtual Human Summit 2022 -","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17077/dhm.31746","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Simulation using virtual models is used widely in industries because it enables efficient creation, testing, and optimization of the design of products and production systems in virtual worlds. Simulation is also used in the design of workstations to assess worker well-being by using digital human modelling (DHM) tools. DHM tools typically include musculoskeletal risk assessment methods, such as RULA, REBA, OWAS, and NIOSH Lifting Equation, that can be used to study, analyse, and evaluate the risk of work-related musculoskeletal disorders of different design solutions in a proactive manner. However, most musculoskeletal risk assessment methods implemented in DHM tools are in essence made to assess static instances only. Also, the methods are typically made to support manual observations of the work rather than by algorithms in a software. This means that, when simulating full work sequences to evaluate manikins’ well-being, using these methods becomes problematic in terms of the legitimacy of the evaluation results. In addition to that, to consider objectives in optimizations they should be measurable with real numbers, which most of musculoskeletal risk assessment methods cannot provide when simulating full work sequences. In this study, we implemented the musculoskeletal risk assessment method OWAS in a digital tool connected to the DHM tool IPS IMMA. We applied the Lundqvist index on top of the OWAS whole body risk category score
使用基于时间的肌肉骨骼风险评估方法来评估焊接站设计优化中的工人福利
使用虚拟模型的仿真在工业中得到了广泛的应用,因为它能够在虚拟世界中高效地创建、测试和优化产品和生产系统的设计。仿真也用于工作站的设计,通过使用数字人体建模(DHM)工具来评估工人的福祉。DHM工具通常包括肌肉骨骼风险评估方法,如RULA、REBA、OWAS和NIOSH升降方程,可用于前瞻性地研究、分析和评估不同设计解决方案与工作相关的肌肉骨骼疾病的风险。然而,在DHM工具中实现的大多数肌肉骨骼风险评估方法本质上仅用于评估静态实例。此外,这些方法通常是为了支持手工观察工作而不是通过软件中的算法。这意味着,当模拟完整的工作序列来评估人体模型的健康状况时,使用这些方法在评估结果的合法性方面就会出现问题。除此之外,为了考虑优化中的目标,它们应该是实数可测量的,这是大多数肌肉骨骼风险评估方法在模拟完整工作序列时无法提供的。在本研究中,我们在连接DHM工具IPS IMMA的数字工具中实现了肌肉骨骼风险评估方法OWAS。我们将Lundqvist指数应用于OWAS全身风险分类评分之上
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信