An Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis Tool for Building Thermal Energy Consumption: A Performance Comprehension of Static and Dynamic Response Analyses

Rasool Koosha, F. Shahsavari
{"title":"An Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis Tool for Building Thermal Energy Consumption: A Performance Comprehension of Static and Dynamic Response Analyses","authors":"Rasool Koosha, F. Shahsavari","doi":"10.1115/detc2019-98510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Recent literature on building energy performance simulation leans toward implementing uncertainty analysis (UA), instead of deterministic solutions, to handle ever-existing and pivotal uncertainties in building design decision-making process. Variations in weather temperature, degradation of building envelope material properties over time, and random behavior of occupants, among all, are the key sources of uncertainty in building energy consumption predictions. The UA couples to the sensitivity analysis (SA) to identify the most influential inputs on the uncertainties of the building energy consumption. This paper describes a newly-developed UA and SA predictive tool for building energy performance simulations. Energy performance simulations are based on a resistance-capacitance thermal model for the building.\n For a hypothetical residential building in College Station, Texas, USA, the present work describes and compares predicted probability distribution and sensitivity indexes produced by the UA-SA tool using a transient (dynamic) response analysis (TRA) and static response analysis (SRA). For brevity, the analysis considers uncertainty only for the exterior walls’ parameters including thickness, thermal conductivity, heat transfer coefficient, density, and heat capacity; i.e., a five-dimensional problem is solved. Compared to the TRA, predictions from the SRA underestimate the annual energy consumption up to 30%; however, SRA is significantly faster. Nonetheless, sensitivity indexes from the SRA and TRA closely match.","PeriodicalId":352702,"journal":{"name":"Volume 1: 39th Computers and Information in Engineering Conference","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 1: 39th Computers and Information in Engineering Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/detc2019-98510","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Recent literature on building energy performance simulation leans toward implementing uncertainty analysis (UA), instead of deterministic solutions, to handle ever-existing and pivotal uncertainties in building design decision-making process. Variations in weather temperature, degradation of building envelope material properties over time, and random behavior of occupants, among all, are the key sources of uncertainty in building energy consumption predictions. The UA couples to the sensitivity analysis (SA) to identify the most influential inputs on the uncertainties of the building energy consumption. This paper describes a newly-developed UA and SA predictive tool for building energy performance simulations. Energy performance simulations are based on a resistance-capacitance thermal model for the building. For a hypothetical residential building in College Station, Texas, USA, the present work describes and compares predicted probability distribution and sensitivity indexes produced by the UA-SA tool using a transient (dynamic) response analysis (TRA) and static response analysis (SRA). For brevity, the analysis considers uncertainty only for the exterior walls’ parameters including thickness, thermal conductivity, heat transfer coefficient, density, and heat capacity; i.e., a five-dimensional problem is solved. Compared to the TRA, predictions from the SRA underestimate the annual energy consumption up to 30%; however, SRA is significantly faster. Nonetheless, sensitivity indexes from the SRA and TRA closely match.
建筑热能消耗的不确定性和敏感性分析工具:静态和动态响应分析的性能理解
最近关于建筑能源性能模拟的文献倾向于实施不确定性分析(UA),而不是确定性解决方案,以处理建筑设计决策过程中始终存在的关键不确定性。天气温度的变化、建筑围护结构材料性能随时间的退化以及居住者的随机行为都是建筑能耗预测中不确定性的主要来源。UA与敏感性分析(SA)相结合,识别出对建筑能耗不确定性影响最大的输入。本文介绍了一种新开发的用于建筑节能性能模拟的UA和SA预测工具。能源性能模拟是基于建筑物的电阻-电容热模型。对于美国德克萨斯州大学城的一个假设住宅建筑,本工作描述并比较了UA-SA工具使用瞬态(动态)响应分析(TRA)和静态响应分析(SRA)产生的预测概率分布和灵敏度指数。为简洁起见,分析只考虑外墙参数的不确定性,包括厚度、导热系数、传热系数、密度和热容;也就是说,解决了一个五维问题。与TRA相比,SRA的预测低估了30%的年能源消耗;然而,SRA要快得多。尽管如此,SRA和TRA的敏感性指标非常接近。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信