Evaluation of the Accuracy of Open-Source DEMs using GPS Data

Akif EL MHAMDI, M. Aarab, Abdelkhalek EL FARİATİ
{"title":"Evaluation of the Accuracy of Open-Source DEMs using GPS Data","authors":"Akif EL MHAMDI, M. Aarab, Abdelkhalek EL FARİATİ","doi":"10.30897/ijegeo.1119695","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The DEM is often required for flooding or drainage modeling, land use studies, and geological or other applications. A variety of DEMs, such as the Advanced Space Thermal Emission Radiometer (ASTER GDEM) and the Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) are currently available to the public free of charge. However, these DEMs remain a representation of reality, which requires, before any application, their evaluation using high-precision reference data. The objective of this study is to assess the quality of the two DEMs, ASTER GDEM and SRTM, in Morocco. The methodology adopted for this validation is based on two approaches: internal validation and external validation. The first validation consists of a comparison of the versions of each product with each other. This processing showed that version 2 and version 3 (1 arcsecond) are the best versions of ASTER and SRTM respectively. For the second validation, the vertical precision of DEMs is evaluated by 3551 GPS control points. The overall vertical accuracy attests to a ″ RMSE ″ mean square error of 8.17 and 10.15 respectively for ASTER and SRTM, compared to the GPS elevation points. These ″ RMSE ″ values are the lowest compared to the other versions of these two products, which confirms the quality of version 2 of ASTER GDEM and that of version 3 (1 arcsecond) of SRTM. An in-depth analysis of SRTM version 3 data (1 arcsecond) and ASTER GDEM v2, shows the presence of outliers associated with the slope, which shows the degradation of the performance of these DEMs with the increase of the slope.","PeriodicalId":176110,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30897/ijegeo.1119695","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The DEM is often required for flooding or drainage modeling, land use studies, and geological or other applications. A variety of DEMs, such as the Advanced Space Thermal Emission Radiometer (ASTER GDEM) and the Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) are currently available to the public free of charge. However, these DEMs remain a representation of reality, which requires, before any application, their evaluation using high-precision reference data. The objective of this study is to assess the quality of the two DEMs, ASTER GDEM and SRTM, in Morocco. The methodology adopted for this validation is based on two approaches: internal validation and external validation. The first validation consists of a comparison of the versions of each product with each other. This processing showed that version 2 and version 3 (1 arcsecond) are the best versions of ASTER and SRTM respectively. For the second validation, the vertical precision of DEMs is evaluated by 3551 GPS control points. The overall vertical accuracy attests to a ″ RMSE ″ mean square error of 8.17 and 10.15 respectively for ASTER and SRTM, compared to the GPS elevation points. These ″ RMSE ″ values are the lowest compared to the other versions of these two products, which confirms the quality of version 2 of ASTER GDEM and that of version 3 (1 arcsecond) of SRTM. An in-depth analysis of SRTM version 3 data (1 arcsecond) and ASTER GDEM v2, shows the presence of outliers associated with the slope, which shows the degradation of the performance of these DEMs with the increase of the slope.
基于GPS数据的开源dem精度评价
DEM通常用于洪水或排水建模、土地利用研究、地质或其他应用。各种dem,如先进空间热发射辐射计(ASTER GDEM)和雷达地形任务(SRTM),目前免费提供给公众。然而,这些dem仍然是现实的代表,这需要在任何应用之前使用高精度参考数据对其进行评估。本研究的目的是评估两个dem的质量,ASTER GDEM和SRTM,在摩洛哥。该验证所采用的方法基于两种方法:内部验证和外部验证。第一个验证包括对每个产品的版本进行比较。结果表明,版本2和版本3 (1 arcsecond)分别是ASTER和SRTM的最佳版本。在第二次验证中,利用3551个GPS控制点评估dem的垂直精度。总体垂直精度证明,与GPS高程点相比,ASTER和SRTM的″RMSE″均方误差分别为8.17和10.15。这些″RMSE″值与这两个产品的其他版本相比是最低的,这证实了ASTER GDEM的版本2和SRTM的版本3 (1 arc秒)的质量。通过对SRTM版本3数据(1 arcsecond)和ASTER GDEM v2数据的深入分析,可以发现存在与坡度相关的异常值,这表明这些dem的性能随着坡度的增加而下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信