Use of Electronic Seizure Diaries and Decision Trees to Predict Seizure Outcome for Patients with Epilepsy

Dominique L. Tanner, M. Privitera, M. Rao, I. Basu
{"title":"Use of Electronic Seizure Diaries and Decision Trees to Predict Seizure Outcome for Patients with Epilepsy","authors":"Dominique L. Tanner, M. Privitera, M. Rao, I. Basu","doi":"10.11159/cist22.139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"- Epilepsy is a neurological disorder that causes unpredictable recurrent seizures. Most people with epilepsy dwell in fear of having unpredictable seizures. In attempts to predict future seizure occurrences, investigators have used data from electronic seizure diaries and machine-learning methods, like decision trees. Using individual patient e-diary data, the purpose of this study is to build patient specific decision trees to 1) determine decision trees overall accuracy in predicting seizures and depicting seizure predictors that influence seizure outcome, and 2) identify seizure predictors that have the most influence on seizure outcome. Patients (n=64) were examined, and their e-diary data was used to build patient specific decision trees. Using a 5-point Likert scale, patients e-diaries entailed information on how they rated the probability of experiencing subsequent seizures and rated their mood, predictive symptoms, stress, and seizure counts. Since e-diaries were recorded in the morning and in the evening, seizures for each patient were assessed by half days. R Programming software was used to generate the decision trees and depict seizure predictors that had the most influence on patient’s seizure outcome. A confusion matrix was performed to obtain the decision trees performance accuracy. Patients were categorized into groups based on certain seizure predictors that they shared. The results showed that for decision trees overall accuracy in predicting seizures and depicting seizure predictors that influenced seizure outcome, 49% of decision trees had an accuracy of 100%; 37% of decision trees had an accuracy ranging between 90-99%; and 13% of decision trees had an accuracy of <90%. Additionally, the results showed that there were more seizure predictors that had influence on patient’s seizure outcome in the morning than in the evening. This work introduces non-invasive precision medicine, with intentions to develop more personalized and reliable health care treatments for people with epilepsy.","PeriodicalId":294100,"journal":{"name":"World Congress on Electrical Engineering and Computer Systems and Science","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Congress on Electrical Engineering and Computer Systems and Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11159/cist22.139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

- Epilepsy is a neurological disorder that causes unpredictable recurrent seizures. Most people with epilepsy dwell in fear of having unpredictable seizures. In attempts to predict future seizure occurrences, investigators have used data from electronic seizure diaries and machine-learning methods, like decision trees. Using individual patient e-diary data, the purpose of this study is to build patient specific decision trees to 1) determine decision trees overall accuracy in predicting seizures and depicting seizure predictors that influence seizure outcome, and 2) identify seizure predictors that have the most influence on seizure outcome. Patients (n=64) were examined, and their e-diary data was used to build patient specific decision trees. Using a 5-point Likert scale, patients e-diaries entailed information on how they rated the probability of experiencing subsequent seizures and rated their mood, predictive symptoms, stress, and seizure counts. Since e-diaries were recorded in the morning and in the evening, seizures for each patient were assessed by half days. R Programming software was used to generate the decision trees and depict seizure predictors that had the most influence on patient’s seizure outcome. A confusion matrix was performed to obtain the decision trees performance accuracy. Patients were categorized into groups based on certain seizure predictors that they shared. The results showed that for decision trees overall accuracy in predicting seizures and depicting seizure predictors that influenced seizure outcome, 49% of decision trees had an accuracy of 100%; 37% of decision trees had an accuracy ranging between 90-99%; and 13% of decision trees had an accuracy of <90%. Additionally, the results showed that there were more seizure predictors that had influence on patient’s seizure outcome in the morning than in the evening. This work introduces non-invasive precision medicine, with intentions to develop more personalized and reliable health care treatments for people with epilepsy.
使用电子发作日记和决策树预测癫痫患者发作结果
癫痫是一种神经系统疾病,会导致不可预测的反复发作。大多数癫痫病人都担心会有不可预测的癫痫发作。在试图预测未来癫痫发作的过程中,调查人员使用了电子癫痫发作日记中的数据和决策树等机器学习方法。使用个体患者电子日记数据,本研究的目的是建立患者特定的决策树,以1)确定决策树在预测癫痫发作和描述影响癫痫发作结果的癫痫发作预测因子方面的总体准确性,以及2)确定对癫痫发作结果影响最大的癫痫发作预测因子。患者(n=64)被检查,他们的电子日记数据被用来建立患者特定的决策树。使用5分李克特量表,患者的电子日记包含了他们如何评估随后癫痫发作的可能性,以及如何评估他们的情绪、预测性症状、压力和癫痫发作次数的信息。由于电子日记是在早上和晚上记录的,所以每个病人的癫痫发作是按半天来评估的。使用R编程软件生成决策树并描述对患者癫痫发作结果影响最大的癫痫发作预测因子。通过混淆矩阵来获得决策树的性能精度。患者根据他们共享的某些癫痫发作预测因子被分类。结果表明,决策树在预测癫痫发作和描述影响癫痫发作结果的癫痫发作预测因子方面的总体准确性,49%的决策树的准确性为100%;37%的决策树准确率在90-99%之间;13%的决策树的准确率小于90%。此外,结果显示,影响患者癫痫发作结果的癫痫发作预测因子在早晨比在晚上更多。这项工作引入了非侵入性精准医学,旨在为癫痫患者开发更个性化和可靠的医疗保健治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信