Building a hybrid systems modeler from synchronous language principles

Marc Pouzet
{"title":"Building a hybrid systems modeler from synchronous language principles","authors":"Marc Pouzet","doi":"10.1109/EMSOFT.2015.7318267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hybrid systems modeling languages are widely used in the development of embedded systems. Two representatives are Simulink/Stateflow1 that combine Ordinary Differential Equations (ODEs), data-flow and difference equations, hierarchical automata a la StateCharts [14] together with imperative features; and the Modelica language [1]2 based on DAEs with features for modeling discrete components. Ptolemy II3 is another example in which several models of computation are combined [15]. The formal verification of hybrid systems has been extensively studied [9]. Yet, we share the viewpoint of Lee and Zheng that hybrid modeling languages are best viewed as programming languages that happen to have a hybrid systems semantics [16, 17]. This raises important questions related to their design, semantics and implementation, to get efficient and reliable simulations as well as provably equivalent embedded target code. While sequential code generation in hybrid modeling tools is routinely used for efficient simulation, it is little used or not used at all to produce target embedded code in critical applications that are submitted to strong safety requirements. This results in a break in the development chain: parts of applications must be rewritten into sequential code and all properties verified on the source model cannot be trusted and have to be reverified on the target code.","PeriodicalId":297297,"journal":{"name":"2015 International Conference on Embedded Software (EMSOFT)","volume":"191 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 International Conference on Embedded Software (EMSOFT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EMSOFT.2015.7318267","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Hybrid systems modeling languages are widely used in the development of embedded systems. Two representatives are Simulink/Stateflow1 that combine Ordinary Differential Equations (ODEs), data-flow and difference equations, hierarchical automata a la StateCharts [14] together with imperative features; and the Modelica language [1]2 based on DAEs with features for modeling discrete components. Ptolemy II3 is another example in which several models of computation are combined [15]. The formal verification of hybrid systems has been extensively studied [9]. Yet, we share the viewpoint of Lee and Zheng that hybrid modeling languages are best viewed as programming languages that happen to have a hybrid systems semantics [16, 17]. This raises important questions related to their design, semantics and implementation, to get efficient and reliable simulations as well as provably equivalent embedded target code. While sequential code generation in hybrid modeling tools is routinely used for efficient simulation, it is little used or not used at all to produce target embedded code in critical applications that are submitted to strong safety requirements. This results in a break in the development chain: parts of applications must be rewritten into sequential code and all properties verified on the source model cannot be trusted and have to be reverified on the target code.
根据同步语言原则构建混合系统建模器
混合系统建模语言在嵌入式系统开发中得到了广泛的应用。两个代表是Simulink/Stateflow1,它结合了常微分方程(ode)、数据流和差分方程、分层自动机和StateCharts[14]以及命令式特征;以及基于DAEs的Modelica语言[1]2,这些DAEs具有对离散组件建模的特征。托勒密II3是另一个将几种计算模型结合在一起的例子[15]。混合系统的形式验证已经得到了广泛的研究[9]。然而,我们同意Lee和Zheng的观点,即混合建模语言最好被视为碰巧具有混合系统语义的编程语言[16,17]。这提出了与它们的设计、语义和实现相关的重要问题,以获得高效可靠的模拟以及可证明的等效嵌入式目标代码。虽然混合建模工具中的顺序代码生成通常用于高效模拟,但在提交强烈安全要求的关键应用程序中,很少使用或根本不使用顺序代码生成目标嵌入代码。这导致了开发链的中断:应用程序的部分必须重写为顺序代码,并且源模型上验证的所有属性都不可信,必须在目标代码上进行重新验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信