Bank Competition and the Effects of Macroprudential Policy on Procyclicality of Lending

I. Kowalska, M. Olszak
{"title":"Bank Competition and the Effects of Macroprudential Policy on Procyclicality of Lending","authors":"I. Kowalska, M. Olszak","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3471170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the extensive debate on the effects of bank competition on risk-taking and procyclicality, there is no evidence of its role in the effects of macroprudential policy on loans’ growth and on the sensitivity of lending to the business cycle. We contribute to the literature by investigating the impact of bank competition on the effects of individual macroprudential tools in a sample covering over 70,000 bank-level observations in 109 countries from 2004 to 2015. Our results are in line with the competition-fragility hypothesis and suggest that increased market power is associated with enhanced loans’ growth in countries in which macroprudential policy is effective in reducing credit growth and with decreased credit growth for instruments that are not effective in diminishing lending. We also find support for the view that increased market power in the banking sector helps to achieve reduced sensitivity of lending to the business cycle in countries that apply cyclical macroprudential instruments due to increased risk-taking in the banking sector. Moreover, we show that, for countries in which macroprudential policy is associated with reduced procyclicality of lending, some degree of market power is beneficial for bank lending, as it tames the excessive countercyclicality of credit.","PeriodicalId":344099,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Banking & Monetary Policy (Topic)","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Banking & Monetary Policy (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3471170","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Despite the extensive debate on the effects of bank competition on risk-taking and procyclicality, there is no evidence of its role in the effects of macroprudential policy on loans’ growth and on the sensitivity of lending to the business cycle. We contribute to the literature by investigating the impact of bank competition on the effects of individual macroprudential tools in a sample covering over 70,000 bank-level observations in 109 countries from 2004 to 2015. Our results are in line with the competition-fragility hypothesis and suggest that increased market power is associated with enhanced loans’ growth in countries in which macroprudential policy is effective in reducing credit growth and with decreased credit growth for instruments that are not effective in diminishing lending. We also find support for the view that increased market power in the banking sector helps to achieve reduced sensitivity of lending to the business cycle in countries that apply cyclical macroprudential instruments due to increased risk-taking in the banking sector. Moreover, we show that, for countries in which macroprudential policy is associated with reduced procyclicality of lending, some degree of market power is beneficial for bank lending, as it tames the excessive countercyclicality of credit.
银行竞争与宏观审慎政策对贷款顺周期性的影响
尽管对银行竞争对风险承担和顺周期的影响进行了广泛的辩论,但没有证据表明它在宏观审慎政策对贷款增长和贷款对商业周期的敏感性的影响中所起的作用。我们通过调查银行竞争对个体宏观审慎工具效果的影响,为文献做出贡献,该样本涵盖了2004年至2015年109个国家的70,000多个银行层面的观察结果。我们的研究结果与竞争脆弱性假说一致,并表明在宏观审慎政策对减少信贷增长有效的国家,市场力量的增加与贷款增长的增加有关,而对于那些不能有效减少贷款的工具,市场力量的增加与信贷增长的减少有关。我们还发现,银行业市场力量的增强有助于降低贷款对商业周期的敏感性,这些国家由于银行业的风险承担增加而采用周期性宏观审慎工具。此外,我们表明,对于宏观审慎政策与贷款顺周期性降低相关的国家,一定程度的市场力量有利于银行贷款,因为它驯服了信贷的过度逆周期性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信