Benefits and Limitations of Remote Work to LGBTQIA+ Software Professionals

Ronnie E. S. Santos, C. Magalhães, P. Ralph
{"title":"Benefits and Limitations of Remote Work to LGBTQIA+ Software Professionals","authors":"Ronnie E. S. Santos, C. Magalhães, P. Ralph","doi":"10.1109/ICSE-SEIS58686.2023.00011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. The mass transition to remote work amid the COVID-19 pandemic profoundly affected software professionals, who abruptly shifted into ostensibly temporary home offices. The effects of this transition on these professionals are complex, depending on the particularities of the context and individuals. Recent studies advocate for remote structures to create opportunities for many equity-deserving groups; however, remote work can also be challenging for some individuals, such as women and individuals with disabilities. As the discussions on equity, diversity, and inclusion increase in software engineering, it is important to explore the realities and perspectives of different equity-deserving groups to develop strategies that can support them post-pandemic. Objective. This study aims to investigate the effects of remote work on LGBTQIA+ software professionals. Method. Grounded theory methodology was applied based on information collected from two main sources: a survey questionnaire with a sample of 57 LGBTQIA+ software professionals and nine follow-up interviews with individuals from this sample. This sample included professionals of different genders, ethnicities, sexual orientations, and levels of experience. Consistent with grounded theory methodology, the process of data collection and analysis was conducted iteratively using three stages of coding: line-by-line, focused, and theoretical. Member checking was used to validate the findings obtained from interpreting the experiences commented on by LGBTQIA+ software professionals. Findings. Our findings demonstrate that (1) remote work benefits LGBTQIA+ people by increasing security and visibility; (2) remote work harms LGBTQIA+ software professionals through isolation and invisibility; (3) the benefits outweigh the drawbacks; (4) the drawbacks can be mitigated by supportive measures developed by software companies. Conclusion. This paper investigated how remote work can affect LGBTQIA+ software professionals and presented a set of recommendations on how software companies can address the benefits and limitations associated with this work model. In summary, we concluded that remote work is crucial in increasing diversity and inclusion in the software industry.General Abstract. Remote work is here to stay. There is no denying it, as some software professionals would rather quit their jobs than return to the office full-time. Therefore, software companies want to understand how the remote working model can be successfully used without causing major issues. The problem is that the effects of remote work are complex because they depend on individual and group characteristics that require careful evaluation. In this scenario, one thing has been extremely positive: remote work is helping to increase diversity in software engineering by fostering new opportunities and better work conditions for individuals from equity-deserving groups, for instance, LGBTQIA+ software professionals. The software industry is overly homogeneous, most of the professionals who work in this area are heterosexual men (a reflection of the university courses on computer science and software engineering), but diversity can only be good for an area that strongly depends on creativity and innovation. What better way to innovate than putting several individuals from different backgrounds and with various experiences to work together? Remote work plays an important role in improving equity, diversity, and inclusion in the software industry. In this paper, we discuss how remote work is affecting software professionals from the LGBTQIA+ community and provide a list of recommendations to support software companies in dealing with this work model.","PeriodicalId":427165,"journal":{"name":"2023 IEEE/ACM 45th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Society (ICSE-SEIS)","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 IEEE/ACM 45th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Society (ICSE-SEIS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE-SEIS58686.2023.00011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background. The mass transition to remote work amid the COVID-19 pandemic profoundly affected software professionals, who abruptly shifted into ostensibly temporary home offices. The effects of this transition on these professionals are complex, depending on the particularities of the context and individuals. Recent studies advocate for remote structures to create opportunities for many equity-deserving groups; however, remote work can also be challenging for some individuals, such as women and individuals with disabilities. As the discussions on equity, diversity, and inclusion increase in software engineering, it is important to explore the realities and perspectives of different equity-deserving groups to develop strategies that can support them post-pandemic. Objective. This study aims to investigate the effects of remote work on LGBTQIA+ software professionals. Method. Grounded theory methodology was applied based on information collected from two main sources: a survey questionnaire with a sample of 57 LGBTQIA+ software professionals and nine follow-up interviews with individuals from this sample. This sample included professionals of different genders, ethnicities, sexual orientations, and levels of experience. Consistent with grounded theory methodology, the process of data collection and analysis was conducted iteratively using three stages of coding: line-by-line, focused, and theoretical. Member checking was used to validate the findings obtained from interpreting the experiences commented on by LGBTQIA+ software professionals. Findings. Our findings demonstrate that (1) remote work benefits LGBTQIA+ people by increasing security and visibility; (2) remote work harms LGBTQIA+ software professionals through isolation and invisibility; (3) the benefits outweigh the drawbacks; (4) the drawbacks can be mitigated by supportive measures developed by software companies. Conclusion. This paper investigated how remote work can affect LGBTQIA+ software professionals and presented a set of recommendations on how software companies can address the benefits and limitations associated with this work model. In summary, we concluded that remote work is crucial in increasing diversity and inclusion in the software industry.General Abstract. Remote work is here to stay. There is no denying it, as some software professionals would rather quit their jobs than return to the office full-time. Therefore, software companies want to understand how the remote working model can be successfully used without causing major issues. The problem is that the effects of remote work are complex because they depend on individual and group characteristics that require careful evaluation. In this scenario, one thing has been extremely positive: remote work is helping to increase diversity in software engineering by fostering new opportunities and better work conditions for individuals from equity-deserving groups, for instance, LGBTQIA+ software professionals. The software industry is overly homogeneous, most of the professionals who work in this area are heterosexual men (a reflection of the university courses on computer science and software engineering), but diversity can only be good for an area that strongly depends on creativity and innovation. What better way to innovate than putting several individuals from different backgrounds and with various experiences to work together? Remote work plays an important role in improving equity, diversity, and inclusion in the software industry. In this paper, we discuss how remote work is affecting software professionals from the LGBTQIA+ community and provide a list of recommendations to support software companies in dealing with this work model.
远程工作对LGBTQIA+软件专业人员的好处和限制
背景。在COVID-19大流行期间,大规模向远程工作的转变深刻影响了软件专业人员,他们突然转移到表面上是临时的家庭办公室。这种转变对这些专业人员的影响是复杂的,取决于环境和个人的特殊性。最近的研究主张采用远程结构,为许多应得权益的群体创造机会;然而,远程工作对一些人来说也很有挑战性,比如女性和残疾人。随着软件工程中关于公平、多样性和包容性的讨论越来越多,探索不同公平群体的现实和观点,以制定能够在大流行后支持他们的战略,这一点很重要。目标。本研究旨在探讨远程工作对LGBTQIA+软件专业人员的影响。方法。基于两个主要来源的信息,应用扎根理论方法:对57名LGBTQIA+软件专业人员的调查问卷和对该样本中个人的9次随访访谈。这个样本包括不同性别、种族、性取向和经验水平的专业人士。与扎根理论方法一致,数据收集和分析过程采用三个编码阶段进行迭代:逐行,重点和理论。成员检查用于验证通过解释LGBTQIA+软件专业人员评论的经验而获得的结果。发现。研究结果表明:(1)远程工作提高了LGBTQIA+人群的安全性和可视性;(2)远程工作对LGBTQIA+软件专业人员造成隔离和隐形伤害;(3)利大于弊;(4)软件公司制定的配套措施可以缓解这些弊端。结论。本文调查了远程工作如何影响LGBTQIA+软件专业人员,并就软件公司如何解决与此工作模型相关的好处和局限性提出了一组建议。总之,我们得出结论,远程工作对于增加软件行业的多样性和包容性至关重要。一般抽象。远程工作将继续存在。这是不可否认的,因为一些软件专业人士宁愿辞职也不愿全职回到办公室。因此,软件公司想要了解如何成功地使用远程工作模型而不引起重大问题。问题是,远程工作的影响是复杂的,因为它们取决于个人和群体的特征,需要仔细评估。在这种情况下,有一件事是非常积极的:远程工作有助于增加软件工程的多样性,为来自平等群体的个人提供新的机会和更好的工作条件,例如,LGBTQIA+软件专业人员。软件行业过于同质化,在这个领域工作的大多数专业人士都是异性恋男性(反映了大学计算机科学和软件工程课程),但多样性只对一个强烈依赖创造力和创新的领域有益。还有什么比让不同背景、不同经历的人一起工作更好的创新方式呢?远程工作在提高软件行业的公平性、多样性和包容性方面发挥着重要作用。在本文中,我们讨论了远程工作如何影响LGBTQIA+社区的软件专业人员,并提供了一系列建议,以支持软件公司处理这种工作模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信