Author and Reader

J. Fennell
{"title":"Author and Reader","authors":"J. Fennell","doi":"10.5840/traddisc20194515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In An Experiment in Criticism, C.S. Lewis demonstrates why, within traditional academic circles, he is best known and most respected for his accomplishments in regard to the study of English literature. Lewis’s important monograph aims to illuminate a new direction in literary criticism, and succeeds marvelously. Interestingly, Lewis’s analysis is paralleled at every turn by Polanyian insights. We have therefore yet a further instance of the intersection of the thought of these two men, and we again wonder at the absence during their lives of recognition of one another. What follows is a fragment of a much larger study that, circumstances permitting, might have been executed under the heading of “The Tacit Dynamics of Lewis’s An Experiment in Criticism.” The present essay will confine itself to examination of one from a long list of pregnant themes that arise from a Polanyian encounter with Lewis’s important monograph, namely, the manner in which Michael Polanyi’s notions of “sense-giving” and “sense-reading” usefully illuminate both the concept of “good reading” that stands at the heart of Lewis’s book and the practice of literary criticism itself. We will begin by explaining what Lewis intends by “good reading.” Following that, we will review Polanyi’s sense-giving and sense-reading before, finally, indicating the role Tradition & Discovery: The Journal of the Polanyi Society 45:1 © 2019 by the Polanyi Society 43 they may play in comprehending reading and criticism alike. In the process many of the themes of the now-dormant larger study will naturally appear.","PeriodicalId":199228,"journal":{"name":"Tradition and Discovery: The Polanyi Society Periodical","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tradition and Discovery: The Polanyi Society Periodical","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/traddisc20194515","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In An Experiment in Criticism, C.S. Lewis demonstrates why, within traditional academic circles, he is best known and most respected for his accomplishments in regard to the study of English literature. Lewis’s important monograph aims to illuminate a new direction in literary criticism, and succeeds marvelously. Interestingly, Lewis’s analysis is paralleled at every turn by Polanyian insights. We have therefore yet a further instance of the intersection of the thought of these two men, and we again wonder at the absence during their lives of recognition of one another. What follows is a fragment of a much larger study that, circumstances permitting, might have been executed under the heading of “The Tacit Dynamics of Lewis’s An Experiment in Criticism.” The present essay will confine itself to examination of one from a long list of pregnant themes that arise from a Polanyian encounter with Lewis’s important monograph, namely, the manner in which Michael Polanyi’s notions of “sense-giving” and “sense-reading” usefully illuminate both the concept of “good reading” that stands at the heart of Lewis’s book and the practice of literary criticism itself. We will begin by explaining what Lewis intends by “good reading.” Following that, we will review Polanyi’s sense-giving and sense-reading before, finally, indicating the role Tradition & Discovery: The Journal of the Polanyi Society 45:1 © 2019 by the Polanyi Society 43 they may play in comprehending reading and criticism alike. In the process many of the themes of the now-dormant larger study will naturally appear.
作者与读者
在《批评的实验》一书中,C.S.刘易斯论证了为什么在传统学术圈中,他在英国文学研究方面的成就最为人所知,也最受人尊敬。刘易斯的重要专著旨在阐明文学批评的新方向,并取得了惊人的成功。有趣的是,刘易斯的分析处处与波兰学派的见解相吻合。因此,我们有了这两个人思想交集的又一个例子,我们又一次对他们一生中彼此不认识感到奇怪。下面是一个更大的研究的片段,如果情况允许,可以在“刘易斯的批评实验的隐性动力”的标题下进行。本文将局限于从波兰人与刘易斯重要专著的接触中产生的一长串重要主题中考察一个主题,即迈克尔·波兰尼的“给予意义”和“意义阅读”的概念如何有效地阐明了刘易斯书中核心的“良好阅读”概念和文学批评本身的实践。我们将首先解释刘易斯所说的“好的阅读”是什么意思。接下来,我们将回顾波兰尼的感官赋予和感官阅读,最后指出波兰尼学会43的传统与发现:波兰尼学会杂志45:1©2019他们在理解阅读和批评方面可能发挥的作用。在这个过程中,目前处于休眠状态的大型研究的许多主题将自然出现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信